Posted on Jun 24, 2017
North Korea’s June 25 Surprise Attack: An Important Lesson
1.11K
7
4
4
4
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 1
"Surprise" is hardly correct, is it? We were treating the Japanese as a belligerent for many months prior to the attack and offered them a plum target. Indeed, there is a plausible conspiracy theory that FDR tempted them into attacking so he could break his promise to the American people and take us to war. As to Korea, Stalin was quite explicit in his strategy for Soviet Expansion. (I still wonder why anyone questioned the "Domino Theory" when it was merely a restatement of Stalin's own vision) When Truman's Scty of State announced that the US would not fight a war to keep Korea from falling to the Communists, he gave them license to attack. Why then was anyone "surprised"?
(2)
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
Rhetorical question, CPT Jack? Any other option would be accepting responsibility for two hostile actions, while not prepared for them, even though as you said, we could see it coming. If the poster is intimating that this could happen again in Korea, he is on the mark. And if we are not prepared, with the same results.
(1)
(0)
SSgt GG-15 RET Jim Lint
Unprepared and slow to react. BUT, once the machine started moving we did amazing things.
(0)
(0)
CWO3 (Join to see)
SSgt GG-15 RET Jim Lint - once the US military-industrial complex gets underway it can really produce, these WW II numbers are mind-boggling: http://www.nationalww2museum.org/learn/education/for-students/ww2-history/ww2-by-the-numbers/wartime-production.html
The National WWII Museum | New Orleans: Learn: For Students: WWII by the Numbers: Wartime...
During World War II, production was at an all-time high.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next