Posted on Jun 12, 2018
MSNBC Actually Asks if Trump's Old Age Versus Kim Jong Un's Young Age Gives US a Disadvantage
5.06K
73
29
15
15
0
The disadvantage the U.S. has in these negotiations is retarded, thoughtless people like this MSNBC twit that handicaps the POTUS even as he is in the midst of negotiations. If she pulled that crap in nK, Kim Jung Un would have her taken out and shot … or worse.
MSNBC Actually Asks if Trump's Old Age Versus Kim Jong Un's Young Age Gives US a Disadvantage
Posted from ijr.com
North Korea
South Korea
Office of the President (POTUS)
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 17
10
10
0
Most of this woman’s disadvantage is a bad contagious mental disorder which is at epidemic proportions at MSNBC and their sparse viewer ship, TDS flavored with gross ignorance.
(10)
(0)
7
7
0
Trump is in office for 4 (8?) years. Kim is in office for life.
Does that put us at a disadvantage?
Equally fucking stupid question there.
Does that put us at a disadvantage?
Equally fucking stupid question there.
(7)
(0)
CPT Zachary Brooks
All true points, also something we tried to do in making Washington king after the Revolutionary War, and the continued reelection of FDR.
The issue therein would be term limits more so than anything else. If the people enjoy what their leader is doing, they should be able to reelect them to office. It's a more flexible form of the "for life" model exercised by places like China, and a less bloody model than that exercised by N. Korea or Cuba until the recent past.
The issue therein would be term limits more so than anything else. If the people enjoy what their leader is doing, they should be able to reelect them to office. It's a more flexible form of the "for life" model exercised by places like China, and a less bloody model than that exercised by N. Korea or Cuba until the recent past.
(0)
(0)
Maj John Bell
GySgt John Olson - Really?
Considering that the president has pulled us out of three international agreements (TPP, Paris, JCPA) which his predecessor had entered (thus demonstrating nothing is nailed down unless perhaps in a treaty validated by the Senate). Isn't that the point, if the President cannot generate a consensus in the Senate, the other party should do their homework and realize our Constitution gives no permanence to international agreements.
As for the Chinese... They gave "...they just gave their guy a life-long job." Really? Or the oligarchy decided what to do and the rank and file Chinese know what happens to whoever says "just a damn minute."
Considering that the president has pulled us out of three international agreements (TPP, Paris, JCPA) which his predecessor had entered (thus demonstrating nothing is nailed down unless perhaps in a treaty validated by the Senate). Isn't that the point, if the President cannot generate a consensus in the Senate, the other party should do their homework and realize our Constitution gives no permanence to international agreements.
As for the Chinese... They gave "...they just gave their guy a life-long job." Really? Or the oligarchy decided what to do and the rank and file Chinese know what happens to whoever says "just a damn minute."
(0)
(0)
5
5
0
Chris Jansing: “Again, somebody who has been trained, who has come through a dynastic situation. Does that give him necessarily an advantage here?”
Why not be honest in your description of Kim Jong Un. He is not part of a "dynastic situation" but a "dictatorship situation".
Why not be honest in your description of Kim Jong Un. He is not part of a "dynastic situation" but a "dictatorship situation".
(5)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google