Avatar feed
Responses: 3
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
1
1
0
So I've come across this issue in my last few years serving the DoD in various roles. I have no problem with our continuing to research and develop new innovative ideas, but the problem is, some leaders believe these ideas already exist and are mature enough to put into the operational fold. We were constantly told to take a look at these rough ideas and consider them for our programs, which ultimately delays our forward progress as we inevitably determine the new idea is not ready to go operational. And yet leadership continues to direct them our way. This is what DARPA, AFRL, and similar organizations in the DoD are for. To find that next best thing and develop it into a tool we can implement immediately.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Ken Landgren
1
1
0
Ok interesting read but we will continue to invest in AI regardless of the inefficiency of tangible progress.

History proves military inventions and concepts are primarily created during wars? Let me see before WWII Blitzkrieg was invented, there were tanks, mechanized vehicles, amphibious landings, air craft carriers, bombers, and I believe sonar and radar were invented before WWII.
(1)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
MAJ Ken Landgren
>1 y
This article describes frustrations but we will invest in AI. It is not a seminal paper.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SP5 Nuclear Weapons Specialist
1
1
0
I sincerely hope that they are paying attention to every aspect of AI.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close