Avatar feed
Responses: 8
SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth
4
4
0
IMHO, this is going to come back and bite them square on the rear.
(4)
Comment
(0)
CW5 Jack Cardwell
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Susan Foster
3
3
0
The 6 modernization priorities make sense and are probably what we need for the future. However, the criticism of FCS was that we bit off more than we could chew, and we can't bite all these at the same time, either. IMO contractors always brief the Army on possibilities--that is, with enough money we can advance the technology, and it's usually not anywhere affordable unless everything goes toward that. We should go back to what DuBois said when we evaluate any potential program: What is it, and what will it accomplish, and at what cost? If it gets too big or complicated, we just cannot depend on being able to manage (or fund) all the moving parts.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SGT Mark Halmrast
SGT Mark Halmrast
>1 y
Sound reasoning Susan Foster. Agree w/you.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Jeff Shearer
1
1
0
Jefe, a simple example is the GPS. Anybody can use a GPS but what do you do when the batteries die? Can you read a map? Navigate... Jefe I remember long after GPS's became the cool thing using paper maps to find a location and navigate there.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGT Mark Halmrast
SGT Mark Halmrast
>1 y
Topo map.
Nothing beats a topo map.
(1)
Reply
(0)
LTC Jeff Shearer
LTC Jeff Shearer
>1 y
SGT Mark Halmrast - Mark at the Special Forces Course a GPS was a get your ass kick out offense. It reached the point by the time it was over we were all pretty damn good navigators.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Mark Halmrast
SGT Mark Halmrast
>1 y
Land Nav matters LTC Jeff Shearer.

Topo map
Pace count
Wrist compass

Pretty much all you need.
That, and a little focus.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close