Posted on Sep 28, 2018
Kavanaugh takes partisan turn as he lashes out at ‘search and destroy’ Democrats
828
37
36
2
2
0
In a remarkable turnabout from the confirmation hearings earlier this month in which he presented himself as the model of neutrality, Kavanaugh fumed that the sexual assault allegations brought against him in recent days had been a “calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election.” He called it “revenge on behalf of the Clintons” and pointed to “millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups.”
Kavanaugh takes partisan turn as he lashes out at ‘search and destroy’ Democrats
Posted from washingtonpost.comPosted in these groups: 
Supreme Court
Political Organization
Supreme Court Political Organization
Posted 6 y ago
Responses: 8
2
2
0
So much for that level-headed, honest, family man that we were promised.
(2)
(0)
SSG Jessica Bautista
MSgt David Hoffman I watched the whole hearing, and I have no idea what lies you're alleging she told and what the basis of that allegation is. Brb, I'm not ignoring you, I just absorb info better with transcripts vs. video.
(0)
(0)
SPC Michael Duricko, Ph.D
SSG Jessica Bautista Apparently you slept through his entire confirmation hearing and then like a good Liberal only heard the lies you wanted to hear.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
Not the temperament nor the political neutrality I would like to see in a Supreme Court justice.
(2)
(0)
LTC David Brown
MSG Stan Hutchison - The investigation could have been handled in a confidential manner. Happens all the time. Grassley made that point. Nobody needed to know Ford was involved, or are you saying the government can’t conduct a confidential investigation? It was either Ford, her lawyers, or the Democrats that leaked it so Ford’s trust was misplaced anyway if Ford didn’t leak it. The Democrats were the only ones who knew about it.
(0)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
LTC David Brown - Not true. The Washington Post knew about it, though they did not know her name.
Two other points; if the Senate (Grassley) investigated, the results would have been inconclusive and/or ignored, and, when has anything the Senate done been kept confidential? The public would have known about even sooner.
I admit this has been a fiasco right from the beginning. I have no doubt part of it was the Dems wanting payback for Merrick Garland. The Repubs wanted to push a super-conservative through to the Court. Both sides put their politics ahead of the good of the nation,, nothing new there.
Two other points; if the Senate (Grassley) investigated, the results would have been inconclusive and/or ignored, and, when has anything the Senate done been kept confidential? The public would have known about even sooner.
I admit this has been a fiasco right from the beginning. I have no doubt part of it was the Dems wanting payback for Merrick Garland. The Repubs wanted to push a super-conservative through to the Court. Both sides put their politics ahead of the good of the nation,, nothing new there.
(0)
(0)
LTC David Brown
MSG Stan Hutchison - so what makes you think the current investigation will produce anything? It may but I have my doubts. I keep thinking of the Duke Lacrosse case and the Rolling Stone Case.
(0)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
LTC David Brown - I do not know what results will come about. But we owe it to the nation to find out.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google