9
9
0
Posted 2 y ago
Responses: 5
It's never been about state's rights or being pro life. It's about CONTROL. And it won't stop at abortion. Clarence Thomas and Republicans in Congress have made it very clear.
(7)
(0)
LTC Kevin B.
MSG Roy Cheever The SCOTUS decision may have been, but this decision to pursue a federal ban certainly isn't.
(5)
(0)
MSgt Steve Sweeney
MSG Roy Cheever - I understand that the recent ruling overturning Roe v Wade was sold to many as a "States rights" issue. You may want to consider that you were sold a bill of goods and the people behind the ruling have bigger objectives in mind. It is possible they lied to you.
(5)
(0)
MSG Roy Cheever
I suppose, to read Supreme Court Justice Thomas’s brief might be in order. To see who is being honest, and not what one party or the other is try to say. MSgt Steve Sweeney
(0)
(0)
MSgt Steve Sweeney
MSG Roy Cheever - Which part of Justice's Thomas brief exactly? The part where he says "... In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents". THAT part of his ruling? Where Thomas calls out Griswold v. Connecticut (contraception), Lawrence (same-sex marriage), and Obergefell (same-sex marriage). “Because any substantive due process decision is ‘demonstrably erroneous,’ we have a duty to ‘correct the error’ established in those precedents.”
THAT part of the ruling? But I understand you may be in favor of the government telling you who you are allowed to love and marry.
THAT part of the ruling? But I understand you may be in favor of the government telling you who you are allowed to love and marry.
(2)
(0)
(0)
(0)
MSgt Steve Sweeney
MSG Roy Cheever - Perhaps Democrats should just violently assault the Supreme Court to get their way?
(3)
(0)
MSG Roy Cheever
That is not what I said. Try reading it again. Maxine Waters and Sandy Cortez said it!
MSgt Steve Sweeney
MSgt Steve Sweeney
(0)
(0)
Read This Next