Posted on Dec 8, 2016
Democrats should fight Trump with the Golden Rule: Rep. Cleaver
4.97K
32
18
3
3
0
Good read.
Can't say I havent broke a couple of these rules myself!!
Can't say I havent broke a couple of these rules myself!!
Democrats should fight Trump with the Golden Rule: Rep. Cleaver
Posted from usatoday.com
Donald Trump
Republicans
Democrats
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 9
4
4
0
You forget that in Politics, the "Golden Rule" means: He who has the Gold, makes the rules. Both parties share the blame on that one.
(4)
(0)
3
3
0
Hmmm, where did I see something on this before? Oh yeah,
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/10/17/president-obama-to-republicans-i-won-deal-with-it/?utm_term=.dcbde1c0bdb3
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/10/17/president-obama-to-republicans-i-won-deal-with-it/?utm_term=.dcbde1c0bdb3
President Obama to Republicans: I won. Deal with it.
An annoyed president laid down the political law. But, will Republicans listen?
(3)
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
MAJ James Woods - He made a similar statement in 2009. Who was obstructing him then. Want to see it? A little obstruction then may have saved us from the disastrous ACA and Dodd-Frank.
(0)
(0)
MAJ James Woods
Sabotage: The Story Behind The Republican Party's "Top Political Priority"...
The music used in this video is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. Track1 by Brian Joseph David Night Owl by B...
PO1 John Crafton -
One source. Yes first two years Obama with his Recovery Act of 2009 got this country back on its feet.
https://youtu.be/y8a_msdw9VQ
Second source. GOP made very clear they didn't want to work with Obama on anything.
https://youtu.be/OM430wb3iYk
Third source. Newt Gingrich
https://youtu.be/yd0fVf5CsCc
A President who refused to sign off on any laws that would deliberately hurt Middle Class America deserved to be vetoed; that's not obstructionism. Inserting last minute amendments into a major bill knowing the President wouldn't agree to it; that's obstructionism through intentional sabotage of a major bill. ACA: Public Option was a key portion of that bill, it was the GOP that wanted it removed; huge mistake by all on that. Now GOP talk about including a Public Option as part of their healthcare alternative to the ACA. Don't you find that a tad hypocritical.
One source. Yes first two years Obama with his Recovery Act of 2009 got this country back on its feet.
https://youtu.be/y8a_msdw9VQ
Second source. GOP made very clear they didn't want to work with Obama on anything.
https://youtu.be/OM430wb3iYk
Third source. Newt Gingrich
https://youtu.be/yd0fVf5CsCc
A President who refused to sign off on any laws that would deliberately hurt Middle Class America deserved to be vetoed; that's not obstructionism. Inserting last minute amendments into a major bill knowing the President wouldn't agree to it; that's obstructionism through intentional sabotage of a major bill. ACA: Public Option was a key portion of that bill, it was the GOP that wanted it removed; huge mistake by all on that. Now GOP talk about including a Public Option as part of their healthcare alternative to the ACA. Don't you find that a tad hypocritical.
(1)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
The Republicans were "obstructing" him to try and prevent his harmful policies and proposals from succeeding. Then there's all of the irrelevant crap that Democrats tried to slip into bills. The Republicans took one for the team by "obstructing" things that would certainly make them look bad to prevent harmful things from getting through.
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google