Posted on Apr 12, 2016
2
2
0
It's obvious that the "Heaven" he is talking about isn't the same "Heaven" that is referred to by "Christians" so that means that there is no chance that this person could even remotely be considered a "Christian Terrorist".
Right?
Right?
Colorado clinic shooter hoped fetuses would thank him for stopping abortions
Posted from reuters.com
Religion
Terrorism
Law
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
0
0
0
0
0
0
It does not matter what WE call a threat. It does not matter what WE think the threats ideology is. When we formulate our strategy, we are foolish if we do not pay attention to what HE calls himself and what HE says his ideology is. It is very difficult to conduct a serious and valid threat assessment otherwise.
(0)
(0)
COL Ted Mc
Maj John Bell - Major; for internal use only you are correct. HOWEVER there may well be "hears and minds" issues which are adversely affected by the terminology which we use publicly to describe a threat.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
Well if you would like to call him that. And give a moral equivalentcy to Islamic terrorist go ahead.
(0)
(0)
COL Ted Mc
TSgt Kenneth Ellis - Sergeant; I consider all "terrorists" to be "morally equivalent" REGARDLESS of their "cause".
Do you believe that "terrorism" is allowable provided that "your cause is just"?
Do you believe that "terrorism" is allowable provided that "your cause is just"?
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google