Avatar feed
Responses: 2
MAJ Ken Landgren
1
1
0
They don't understand the significance of losing the technological advantage for the military.
(1)
Comment
(0)
1SG Retired
1SG (Join to see)
6 y
Concur. Happy thoughts don't keep bad actors in check.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Combat Engineer
SGT (Join to see)
6 y
It's worse than that it's like a bunch of chronological adults that are still emotionally children and they are play acting as if they are resisting some imaginary oppression. Microsoft should fire them and hire actual adults.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
MAJ Ken Landgren
6 y
1SG (Join to see) like if the weapons disappear, war will disappear as well. Fire them!
(1)
Reply
(0)
1SG Retired
1SG (Join to see)
6 y
MAJ Ken Landgren they likely also believe unicorns poop butterflies.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Combat Engineer
0
0
0
Microsoft should just go ahead and can them.
(0)
Comment
(0)
1SG Retired
1SG (Join to see)
6 y
Likely be considered wrongful termination, and I thought the article said they were unionized, so it's likely covered communication. They can, however, offer to provide them a good recommendation for a non-war profiteer.
I'm wondering where they even came up with that term based on the project.
Guess they are okay with the legal, moral and ethical issues with MS's antitrust settlement with the US, and it's loss for similar issues in the EU.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Combat Engineer
SGT (Join to see)
6 y
1SG (Join to see) I have only had civilian employment in right to work states. The idea of software developers being in a union seems really strange to me. It's one thing to know how to write code but it is another thing to be any good at it. Same or more so for other technical work. Microsoft has offices in Texas which I think is a right to work state. Move it to Austin.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Retired
1SG (Join to see)
6 y
SGT (Join to see)
The guns alone would likely prevent them following.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close