3
3
0
Interesting adjustment to the first 10
In these times of divisiveness I find the Fifth Amendment to be of interest . . . Fifth Amendment
"Due process" terminology was added later. Our 5th not only protects against self-incrimination, it prohibits “double jeopardy” (being prosecuted twice for the same offense twice).
It is useful to remember this when past accusations have been settled - in the event if they come up again later simply for the purposes of harassment.
In the event past allegations that have been resolved are brought up, again, primarily for the purposes of harassment, it is vital to remember that we have the right to be free being prosecured more than once for an offense but also from being harassed about alleged offensives that have been tried and proven to be false.
In these times of divisiveness I find the Fifth Amendment to be of interest . . . Fifth Amendment
"Due process" terminology was added later. Our 5th not only protects against self-incrimination, it prohibits “double jeopardy” (being prosecuted twice for the same offense twice).
It is useful to remember this when past accusations have been settled - in the event if they come up again later simply for the purposes of harassment.
In the event past allegations that have been resolved are brought up, again, primarily for the purposes of harassment, it is vital to remember that we have the right to be free being prosecured more than once for an offense but also from being harassed about alleged offensives that have been tried and proven to be false.
10 Facts About the First 10 Constitutional Amendments
Posted from historyfacts.comPosted in these groups: 
Bill of Rights
Bill of Rights
Posted 3 mo ago
Responses: 2
3
3
0
Kind of difficult when someone waits for decades to file formal charges and the system allows them to ignore any statute of limitations.
(3)
(0)
2
2
0
SGT Mary G.
Hmm . . . I had to take a quick look.
The Ninth seems to reaffirm our inalienable rights, listed and not listed, in the Declaration of Independence.
All I know about the 10th is that it seems to have been misused recently by SCOTUS regarding an inalienable right that we all have over our own bodies.
And how about that "retributive punishment" for those who have had abortions that want to dictate the right to make one's own health decisions, surely an inalienable right.
When ONLY religious belief is used to promote opinions, that result in policies, clearly it is a violate the separation clause, imo.
The Ninth seems to reaffirm our inalienable rights, listed and not listed, in the Declaration of Independence.
All I know about the 10th is that it seems to have been misused recently by SCOTUS regarding an inalienable right that we all have over our own bodies.
And how about that "retributive punishment" for those who have had abortions that want to dictate the right to make one's own health decisions, surely an inalienable right.
When ONLY religious belief is used to promote opinions, that result in policies, clearly it is a violate the separation clause, imo.
(0)
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
SGT Mary G. I am very strongly anti-abortion. But despite that, I can still look at things objectively. And to me, this was the single biggest fault with the Roe decision. They should have based it in the 9th Amendment, and it likely would not have been able to be overturned in Dobbs.
Dobbs was not decided based on religion, though. May want to revisit your facts.
Dobbs was not decided based on religion, though. May want to revisit your facts.
(1)
(0)
SGT Mary G.
SFC Casey O'Mally I highly value objectivity. Seems so rare, at time. Yes, I understand about Dobbs. However, dumping the issue on states, instead of leaving it be, has resulted in nearly all the state laws have been justified and defended by people who cite their religious bellief as the reason for the laws - regardless of medical need.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google