Avatar feed
Responses: 1
SFC Casey O'Mally
1
1
0
TMP fleet? Sure. Bad idea, but fine. Non-tactical "tactical" vehicles like soft sided HMMWVs? Worse idea, but not disastrous.

But combat vehicles? Unless you have easily removable batteries AND a huge stockpile so that each vehicle can carry a couple spares, with plenty leftover for the supply trains, you are going to be combat ineffective before you ever make it to combat.

For all their furl inefficiency, current combat vehicles are very easily refueled. A tanker truck can roll up and get a full company rolling in half an hour. If we cannot reproduce that capacity, or something very close to it, we are taking a huge step backwards in combat capability.
(1)
Comment
(0)
LTC David Brown
LTC David Brown
>1 y
I was wondering about supply vehicles. The Red Ball expressed burned more fuel than it delivered! . How do you do that with battery operated vehicles?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
SFC Casey O'Mally
>1 y
LTC David Brown You would need some kind of "super-battery" truck with multiple charging ports. Hook up 10 trucks, leave them 30 minutes for a fast charge, and roll out.

I cannot imagine how big of a hazard that truck would be. You think tankers are a big target for gig "gobooms", imagine that superbattery. Then add in it is likely to be lithium, which means almost impossible to put out...

Yeah, we aren't there technologically, and it is pretty much unthinkable we will be there in 7 years. Maybe in 27 for 2050. But 2030? Not bloody likely.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close