Posted on Jul 27, 2022
Matt Gaetz, under investigation for possible sex trafficking, was among 20 Republicans to vote...
229
8
4
5
5
0
Why are Republicans voting against sex-trafficking laws?
Matt Gaetz, under investigation for possible sex trafficking, was among 20 Republicans to vote...
Posted from businessinsider.comPosted in these groups: 
Crime
Republicans
Crime Republicans
Posted 2 y ago
Responses: 2
2
2
0
Good question. There’s twenty of them, and they include the “usual suspects”.
(2)
(0)
0
0
0
"...has been reauthorized multiple times without significant challenge." The same as this time. But because the left doesn't like Matt Gaetz, now it's an issue.
(0)
(0)
MSgt Steve Sweeney
And now there is a "significant challenge" in Matt Gaetz. Why is your hero, and 19 other Republicans, opposing this bill?
(0)
(0)
Sgt (Join to see)
MSgt Steve Sweeney - Significant challenge?? Are you serious?
It passed 401-20. You see that as significant?
What makes you think he's a hero of mine? Or any politician for that matter? That's just a typical stupid thing to say.
And if you're really interested on knowing why he voted against it, along with 19 others, it's actually really easy to find out.
Just type "http://www.google.com" into your address bar.
I'll help you with this one...
"...his spokesman, Joel Valdez, told USA Today on Thursday that Gaetz had a problem with the bill because it did not “accurately and specifically define human trafficking” and had a high cost.
Valdez said that the lack of a specific definition for human trafficking allowed the legislation “to act as a backdoor loophole for illegal immigration and amnesty.”"
It passed 401-20. You see that as significant?
What makes you think he's a hero of mine? Or any politician for that matter? That's just a typical stupid thing to say.
And if you're really interested on knowing why he voted against it, along with 19 others, it's actually really easy to find out.
Just type "http://www.google.com" into your address bar.
I'll help you with this one...
"...his spokesman, Joel Valdez, told USA Today on Thursday that Gaetz had a problem with the bill because it did not “accurately and specifically define human trafficking” and had a high cost.
Valdez said that the lack of a specific definition for human trafficking allowed the legislation “to act as a backdoor loophole for illegal immigration and amnesty.”"
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google