How Fox Is Covering The Secret Service Texts Scandal

That's America for you

1) Are the Secret Service Agents (SSAs) Cabinet Secretaries? If not, their missteps, if any, would naturally recieve lesser (less frequent and/or less pointed / critical) coverage.

2) Did the SSAs send classified texts over unlassified phones? If not, then this is most likely a lesser offense which would naturally recieve lesser coverage.

3) Are there very clear rules regarding filing of text message for the Secret Service? Ones which are non-ambiguous and prevent SSAs from deleting ANY work-related texts? And that the SSAs had to sign? If not then the offenses, if any, are less obvious and less egregious and..... Would naturally recieve less coverage.

4) Has there been a massive FBI investigation into their texts sparked by reports of accounts of a large volume of mishandled texts? If not, then the federal government thinks it is not as big of a deal which means....you guessed it!..... It would naturally recieve lesser coverage.


But sure. The two are EXACTLY the same and should TOTALLY be treated the same.

https://video.foxnews.com/v/ [login to see] 112