Posted on Jul 12, 2022
Why this key chance to getting permanent birth control is often missed
1.85K
12
6
5
5
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
I did a lot of Anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation. A good OBGYN can do one in about 10 to 15 minutes laparoscopically skin to skin. They are a money maker for hospitals. I really don’t get this as being a problem. I did a rotation at Fort Bragg and we used to do a couple a day. It seems the problem is physician related. Talking to patients, getting form signed and keeping chart together. Yes, some hospitals may restrict tubals so insure your OBGYN has privileges at a hospital that allows them. A lot of OB practices are machines that work very smoothly.
(2)
(0)
Tubal ligation can be reversed so it need not be permanent. Over 50% of women who have it reversed go on to get pregnant
(2)
(0)
LTC David Brown
SGT (Join to see) - what makes you think it will be illegal? Just curious. I am conservative, Trump supporter and I see a lot of disinformation from the left. I see nothing wrong with birth control. I think it is responsible thing to do.
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
LTC David Brown Haven't been paying attention have you. Medication for cancer,epilepsy numerous other conditions will now be illegal. The Indiana Doc who did the abortion on the 10 year old girl is now being sued by Indiana. A clerk in Walgreens refused to sell a married woman condoms because it violated her faith and Walgreens was just fine with that. All I can say you all have kicked over a fire ants nest and stood in the middle of it to knock down a hornets nest without considering the mess they just created for yourself.
(0)
(0)
a couple of notes on this
after my 4th pg, 3rd live birth, my AD Army OB-GYN did perform my tubal ligation--but he had counseled me to wait 6 months due to prior loss of pg and he was of the opinion that a wait and see approach might be wise and I concurred
many women are running headlong into patriarchal attitudes that 1. require male spouse to sign off on the surgery; 2. if not currently married but desiring a tubal they are turned away in case they meet THAT guy someday in the future who might want kids.
third point, many women in their child-bearing years have significant other conditions (immuno-compromised, type 1 diabetes, significant endometriosis and so on) and would like hysterectomies to assure no further child-bearing and are turned away for the same patriarchal attitudes instead of being recognized as having full autonomy over their body to make informed decisions
also lots of men face the same arguements as being too young to decide on a vasectomy because "someday"
at least for men, banking sperm is a relatively easy option so the discussion of reversal success is not the issue
after my 4th pg, 3rd live birth, my AD Army OB-GYN did perform my tubal ligation--but he had counseled me to wait 6 months due to prior loss of pg and he was of the opinion that a wait and see approach might be wise and I concurred
many women are running headlong into patriarchal attitudes that 1. require male spouse to sign off on the surgery; 2. if not currently married but desiring a tubal they are turned away in case they meet THAT guy someday in the future who might want kids.
third point, many women in their child-bearing years have significant other conditions (immuno-compromised, type 1 diabetes, significant endometriosis and so on) and would like hysterectomies to assure no further child-bearing and are turned away for the same patriarchal attitudes instead of being recognized as having full autonomy over their body to make informed decisions
also lots of men face the same arguements as being too young to decide on a vasectomy because "someday"
at least for men, banking sperm is a relatively easy option so the discussion of reversal success is not the issue
(1)
(0)
Read This Next