3
3
0
10-year-old rape victim forced to travel from Ohio to Indiana for abortion
The case of a 10-year-old child rape victim in Ohio who was six weeks pregnant, ineligible for an abortion in her own state, and forced to travel to Indiana for the procedure has spotlighted the shocking impact of the US supreme court ruling on abortion.
The story of the girl came to light three days after the court overturned a nationwide right to terminate pregnancy, and Ohio’s six-week “trigger ban” came into effect.
The case of a 10-year-old child rape victim in Ohio who was six weeks pregnant, ineligible for an abortion in her own state, and forced to travel to Indiana for the procedure has spotlighted the shocking impact of the US supreme court ruling on abortion.
The story of the girl came to light three days after the court overturned a nationwide right to terminate pregnancy, and Ohio’s six-week “trigger ban” came into effect.
ohio-indiana-abortion-rape-victim
Posted from google.comPosted in these groups: 
Abortion
Abortion
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
5
5
0
4
4
0
This case proves the pro forced birthers don't care about kids when they advocate that this pregnancy isn't terminated.
A 10 year old is not built for pregnancy or birthing. At all. And 6 weeks THREE DAYS?!?
Why don't people understand when one goes to the doctor to confirm a pregnancy and they ay "oh you're 6-7 weeks" it's an estimate? It's literally a guess based on the date of the last menstrual cycle. That's it.
Imagine any 10 year old you know or if you have kids when they were 10 and this happened. Would you actually force them to a potential death sentence? Make them stay pregnant?
All these abortion bans do is put the lives of those pregnant in danger, including children. It just proves with this case pro forced birthers don't actually care about children or even fetuses and embryos. It's about control.
A 10 year old is not built for pregnancy or birthing. At all. And 6 weeks THREE DAYS?!?
Why don't people understand when one goes to the doctor to confirm a pregnancy and they ay "oh you're 6-7 weeks" it's an estimate? It's literally a guess based on the date of the last menstrual cycle. That's it.
Imagine any 10 year old you know or if you have kids when they were 10 and this happened. Would you actually force them to a potential death sentence? Make them stay pregnant?
All these abortion bans do is put the lives of those pregnant in danger, including children. It just proves with this case pro forced birthers don't actually care about children or even fetuses and embryos. It's about control.
(4)
(0)
Maj John Bell
SrA John Monette - Who is the "they" who won't have anything to do with the child born to a 10-year-old? Just looking at faith-based charities of the three major religions there are scores of national charities that include outreach and assistance to single mothers, hundreds of regional and local faith-based charities. Then, include the donations and volunteerism by pro-life advocates to secular charities, your assertion doesn't hold up.
From the link:
"Using voting and IRS data for the residents of 3,000 counties across the nation, the four-professor research team found, according to the New York Times, that counties which are “overwhelmingly Republican” report higher charitable contributions than Democratic-dominated counties."
https://nonprofitquarterly.org/republicans-give-more-to-charity-than-democrats-but-theres-a-bigger-story-here/
From the link:
"Using voting and IRS data for the residents of 3,000 counties across the nation, the four-professor research team found, according to the New York Times, that counties which are “overwhelmingly Republican” report higher charitable contributions than Democratic-dominated counties."
https://nonprofitquarterly.org/republicans-give-more-to-charity-than-democrats-but-theres-a-bigger-story-here/
Republicans Give More to Charity Than Democrats, but There’s a Bigger Story Here - Non Profit...
One could conclude that Republican party is, despite the conventional wisdom, the party that cares about those in need and puts its money where its mouth is. But the true picture is more complex, reflecting at best a real difference between the parties in the best way to approach the challenge of human need.
(2)
(0)
1SG (Join to see)
We have a religious activist court now that will cause much harm and will have to be corrected in the future. They do not care about the constitution, they care about white christian nationalism. Their numbers are dwindling and this is their last resort.
(2)
(0)
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
PO1 Jeff Chandler - So you think it's okay that SCOTUS nominees can lie under oath while they are having confirmation hearings? Because the last 3 lied in their hearings about Roe and overturning it.
(1)
(0)
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
PO1 Jeff Chandler - They aren't interpreting anything - and the lied under oath during their confirmation hearings. Potato.
(1)
(0)
2
2
0
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff Your link does not work.
This is, as best I can tell, the current Ohio Revised Code relating to unlawful abortion upon a minor. Clearly the code does make allowance for an abortion procedure for a 10-year-old girl. Something does not add up with the narrative you provide. But I cannot figure out what until you provide a working link.
Ohio Revised Code: Section 2919.121 | Unlawful abortion upon minor.
(B) No person shall knowingly perform or induce an abortion upon a pregnant minor unless one of the following is the case:
(1) The attending physician has secured the informed written consent of the minor and one parent, guardian, or custodian.
(3) ...If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the abortion is in the best interests of the minor, the court shall give judicial consent to the abortion, setting forth the grounds for its finding.
(D) It is an affirmative defense to any civil, criminal, or professional disciplinary claim brought under this section that compliance with the requirements of this section was not possible because an immediate threat of serious risk to the life or physical health of the minor from the continuation of her pregnancy created an emergency necessitating the immediate performance or inducement of an abortion.
PO1 Jeff Chandler
https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-revised-code/section-2919.121
This is, as best I can tell, the current Ohio Revised Code relating to unlawful abortion upon a minor. Clearly the code does make allowance for an abortion procedure for a 10-year-old girl. Something does not add up with the narrative you provide. But I cannot figure out what until you provide a working link.
Ohio Revised Code: Section 2919.121 | Unlawful abortion upon minor.
(B) No person shall knowingly perform or induce an abortion upon a pregnant minor unless one of the following is the case:
(1) The attending physician has secured the informed written consent of the minor and one parent, guardian, or custodian.
(3) ...If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the abortion is in the best interests of the minor, the court shall give judicial consent to the abortion, setting forth the grounds for its finding.
(D) It is an affirmative defense to any civil, criminal, or professional disciplinary claim brought under this section that compliance with the requirements of this section was not possible because an immediate threat of serious risk to the life or physical health of the minor from the continuation of her pregnancy created an emergency necessitating the immediate performance or inducement of an abortion.
PO1 Jeff Chandler
https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-revised-code/section-2919.121
(2)
(0)
Maj John Bell
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff - The premise of your response to SPC Colin Ahasay is off-base. There is absolutely ZERO difference in this young girl's ability to get an abortion in Ohio before or after the Dobbs decision over-turned Roe v. Wade. The article is a flat out lie. She may have taken to Indiana, but there was no reason to do so. Instead of taking a journalists lie for the gospel, just read the Ohio revised code. The link is above.
(1)
(0)
Suspended Profile
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff - So instead of doing the right thing right you, both your stupid response and my reply to your stupid response get deleted.
Standard level members on this site can do neither, almost like you used your position to protect your career, a veteran wouldn't be on leave, an active unit SARC rep could be whether terminal or not. You said something about caring...
You ever wonder why folks like me say things like "you don't give a fuck unless it's politically convenient." This.
EDIT: I upvoted every comment and answer on the post except yours, just to prove my point. Unless you think fewer people should have a voice.
Standard level members on this site can do neither, almost like you used your position to protect your career, a veteran wouldn't be on leave, an active unit SARC rep could be whether terminal or not. You said something about caring...
You ever wonder why folks like me say things like "you don't give a fuck unless it's politically convenient." This.
EDIT: I upvoted every comment and answer on the post except yours, just to prove my point. Unless you think fewer people should have a voice.
(0)
(0)
Suspended Profile
Maj John Bell - And I voluntarily put myself into a two week timeout from this site, as in did not visit the site once or log on.
I'm just going to stay far away from any post related to abortion, gender equality, and in particular sexual misconduct. My own background puts me in an irrational mindset with those topics.
I'm just going to stay far away from any post related to abortion, gender equality, and in particular sexual misconduct. My own background puts me in an irrational mindset with those topics.
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google