7
7
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
MSG Roy Cheever
On the contrary, Sir.
The decision is exactly that.
Infanticide or anbortion decisions are now back to individual choices and what they tell their state government what laws should or should not be.
The decision is exactly that.
Infanticide or anbortion decisions are now back to individual choices and what they tell their state government what laws should or should not be.
(0)
(0)
LTC Kevin B.
MSG Roy Cheever The SCOTUS decision may have been, but this decision to pursue a federal ban certainly isn't.
(4)
(0)
MSG Roy Cheever
I suppose, to read Supreme Court Justice Thomas’s brief might be in order. To see who is being honest, and not what one party or the other is try to say. MSgt Steve Sweeney
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
MSG Roy Cheever
That is not what I said. Try reading it again. Maxine Waters and Sandy Cortez said it!
MSgt Steve Sweeney
MSgt Steve Sweeney
(0)
(0)
Thank you LTC Chu for posting this.
This should go no where. Because this SCOTUS decision places the abortion issues back to the State’s Legislatures and their constituents to decide. And as a Republican, I will tell my Federal Representatives, not to make Federal legislation on this issue cause it is no longer in their lane.
And Democrats should tell their representatives the same.
It is no longer a Federal issue cause it never was a constitutional right.
This should go no where. Because this SCOTUS decision places the abortion issues back to the State’s Legislatures and their constituents to decide. And as a Republican, I will tell my Federal Representatives, not to make Federal legislation on this issue cause it is no longer in their lane.
And Democrats should tell their representatives the same.
It is no longer a Federal issue cause it never was a constitutional right.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next