Avatar feed
Responses: 4
CW4 Guy Butler
3
3
0
I still don’t know why this is so difficult to understand.
(3)
Comment
(0)
PO1 Cryptologic Technician Collection
PO1 (Join to see)
>1 y
It is all just rooted in hypocrisy and weaponizing government to punish people and companies that disagree with them. I bet they attempt to get this challenged in the Supreme Court.

The GOP has always favored the position that you can't compel someone to speak. One example is the Colorado baker who didn't want to make a cake for a same-sex marriage. Forcing him to do so would compel speech (or expression) and that has always been fundamentally understood to violate the First Amendment.

Furthermore, the GOP loves to treat companies as "people" in that companies can have protected political speech and can also make campaign donations. The problem the GOP has is that they simply disagree with the speech.
(2)
Reply
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
>1 y
PO1 (Join to see) -Damn CTR1 Yor are Much Better with the English Language than CTO1!
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
>1 y
Allies and in So Many Ways we Are So Different. LOL! Thank God for Lawyers, Even the "Godfather" of William Wesling "Chip" Nagel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeBy1Ee8LCg
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Cryptologic Technician Collection
PO1 (Join to see)
>1 y
Capt Gregory Prickett - I
Misunderstood the outcome of that case then.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Air Defense Radar Repairer
1
1
0
One would think the Republicans could finally decide if they want limited government or not.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Richard Kensinger
1
1
0
Victory for the 1st amendment!
Rich
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close