Posted on Mar 4, 2022
Jan. 6 Panel Sees Evidence of Trump 'Criminal Conspiracy'
1.31K
55
39
7
7
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 5
Cpl Benjamin Long
SrA John Monette So who can walk... You are inserting aliens into this narrative...
(0)
(0)
The January 6 Commission's impartiality became suspect when Speaker Pelosi refused to seat two of House Minority Leader McCarthy's candidates. If strong support for President Trump was grounds for denial, should not strong opposition to President Trump have also been grounds for denial?
I'll start paying attention when the DOJ hands out an indictment. So far it isn't even "near beer."
I'll start paying attention when the DOJ hands out an indictment. So far it isn't even "near beer."
(2)
(0)
SPC Kevin Ford
Of course she did. The Republican House leadership acted in bad faith when they appointed people likely to be investigated as part of the committee to investigate them. That bit of Kabuki Theater was done so people could make comments like you did above and ignore the evidence that is found.
Now there could have been a completely independent bi partisan committee investigating this. Remind me again why that didn't happen?
Now there could have been a completely independent bi partisan committee investigating this. Remind me again why that didn't happen?
(3)
(0)
Maj John Bell
SPC Kevin Ford - Let's start out with the Representatives on the committee don't do the actual investigating. They are legislators, not investigating attorneys, not law enforcement, not private investigators. At most, they question at hearings where presumably all the committee members will be in attendance. So, explain how the integrity of the investigation would be compromised. And then match your explanation up against why their potential bias is any more likely to compromise the committee than the bias of Speaker Pelosi's appointed Democrat membership.
(1)
(0)
SPC Kevin Ford
Maj John Bell -
You stated:
"So, explain how the integrity of the investigation would be compromised."
Are or are not the Congressional hearings mostly done in public where they can be turned into a circus? Have you watched Congress. If you don't think you can obstruct something by sitting on a board, even in the minority, then I have to believe you haven't done it.
I'll ask you again, there was an opportunity for a completely independent and bipartisan investigation. Why didn't it happen?
You stated:
"So, explain how the integrity of the investigation would be compromised."
Are or are not the Congressional hearings mostly done in public where they can be turned into a circus? Have you watched Congress. If you don't think you can obstruct something by sitting on a board, even in the minority, then I have to believe you haven't done it.
I'll ask you again, there was an opportunity for a completely independent and bipartisan investigation. Why didn't it happen?
(1)
(0)
Maj John Bell
SPC Kevin Ford - What was that opportunity? I cannot comment until you explain what it was.
And I'll ask again, why are the Democrats any less likely to turn the entire thing into a circus than the Republicans? They would have held the majority of the seats on the commission. The "circus would have been limited to the time each representative was allowed to question anyone appearing before the commission.
And I'll ask again, why are the Democrats any less likely to turn the entire thing into a circus than the Republicans? They would have held the majority of the seats on the commission. The "circus would have been limited to the time each representative was allowed to question anyone appearing before the commission.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next