Posted on Feb 2, 2022
First African American picked for key Southern Baptist Convention position
561
4
1
4
4
0
Posted 3 y ago
Responses: 1
Considering that the Southern Baptist Convention was created by European Americans, I can see why the long haul before the first non-European American. Don't see how his election is any condemnation upon "white supremacy". Did the entire Nation not but a non-European American into the White House for 8 years, just to have racial division reach fever pitch? I condemn the Southern Baptist Convention for ONLY condemning "white supremacy", while wholly ignoring the supremacist notions of other racial and ethnic groups. This singling out of only one race, while ignoring all the others, is a blatant affirmation of racism. We are either all equal or we are not. All lives matter or none do. On these, there are no gray areas. It is one or the other.
You can't pretty this up with terminology. Perhaps you noticed my over use of 'European American', with the complete avoidance of 'African American'. The disparity of calling one race 'White' while calling another 'African American' is purposeful. It imparts ownership to one, while relieving it from another. A cancelling out of who actually fought, bled, and died to create this Nation. Secondly, 'African American' is a 'Black supremacist' notion. Historically, the African continent has not been populated with just one race. It is disingenuous to proclaim Africa to be the homeland solely of the Black race. Do the same people that profess that, also profess that Europe is the homeland solely of the White race by calling all White Americans as 'European Americans'? All this may sound nit picky or be lauded as "supremacist ideas", but can you truly state that they are applied equally? We have Asian Americans, Native Americans, African Americans, Latin Americans, Hispanic Americans, Caribbean Americans, but no European Americans. Think about it. That is not by accident. Nothing the Progressive-Left does is by accident. We are either equal, or we are not. We either globally condemn supremacist ideology, wherever it may lay, or we are part of the problem. We are all Brothers and Sisters in Christ, or we are not.
You can't pretty this up with terminology. Perhaps you noticed my over use of 'European American', with the complete avoidance of 'African American'. The disparity of calling one race 'White' while calling another 'African American' is purposeful. It imparts ownership to one, while relieving it from another. A cancelling out of who actually fought, bled, and died to create this Nation. Secondly, 'African American' is a 'Black supremacist' notion. Historically, the African continent has not been populated with just one race. It is disingenuous to proclaim Africa to be the homeland solely of the Black race. Do the same people that profess that, also profess that Europe is the homeland solely of the White race by calling all White Americans as 'European Americans'? All this may sound nit picky or be lauded as "supremacist ideas", but can you truly state that they are applied equally? We have Asian Americans, Native Americans, African Americans, Latin Americans, Hispanic Americans, Caribbean Americans, but no European Americans. Think about it. That is not by accident. Nothing the Progressive-Left does is by accident. We are either equal, or we are not. We either globally condemn supremacist ideology, wherever it may lay, or we are part of the problem. We are all Brothers and Sisters in Christ, or we are not.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next