Avatar feed
Responses: 2
SFC Randy Hellenbrand
1
1
0
Edited 3 y ago
Too bad more of them weren't shot. Without a doubt though, there was sensitive stuff shown that the Capital security would of probably preferred not to get out.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PFC David Foster
1
1
0
I'm confused, why would the "PROSECUTORS" be fighting to keep evidence under seal??? Unless they are Trump supporters??? Just saying!!!
(1)
Comment
(0)
LTC Eugene Chu
LTC Eugene Chu
3 y
Quote from story about why: The government opposed making the videos public. In response to a petition filed by the media coalition, prosecutors wrote that the videos featured nonpublic information about entrances and exits around the Capitol, and that releasing them would “compromise the security of the United States Capitol and those who work there.”
(2)
Reply
(0)
SPC Erich Guenther
SPC Erich Guenther
3 y
If you have been to the Capitol building, approx 80-85% is open to the Public. Saying it is a security risk to show to the public what the public can already see on a tour is not a valid reason. Further the Judge stated correctly if your going to release parts of the sealed videos that you choose to the public you cannot hold back the other parts. The Judge saw the reason given for what it was....BS.
(1)
Reply
(0)
PFC David Foster
PFC David Foster
3 y
LTC Eugene Chu - What a crop of horse shit. Thanks.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close