Posted on Sep 13, 2021
4
4
0
Technology
Science
Vehicle
Responses: 5
1
1
0
It is interesting but it takes a lot of energy to crack water to obtain the hydrogen.
(1)
(0)
LTC David Brown
They are doing it in Denmark using electricity from solar panels. http://www.fch.europa.eu/sites/default/files/Now%20you%20can%20drive%20all%20the%20way%20through%20Denmark%20-%20on%20hydrogen%20(ID%202872494).pdf
Page not found | www.fch.europa.eu
A new independent fact-based Study on Fuel Cells Hydrogen Trucks, released on 15 December 2020, provides an in-depth analysis of the market potential of heavy duty fuel cells trucks underpinned with concrete case studies.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
I've always believed that the future would be Hydrogen. It's too bad our own auto manufactures are behind the curve.
(1)
(0)
SGT Mary G.
Cpl (Join to see) - Maybe they will get on board after hydrogen technology becomes more functional? Water as a byproduct of the technology raises questions. In the form of vapor? How much? Will it accumulate on the road, create excessive humidity?
(1)
(0)
Cpl (Join to see)
Considering the #1 green house gas in our atmosphere, right now, is water vapor, it makes one wonder. Reducing one while increasing the other could be a big issue. I'd rather have the gas that plants use to make oxygen not be reduced further when it's scientific fact that more CO2 makes the planet greener.
https://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2009-03/top-ten-greenhouse-gases/
https://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2009-03/top-ten-greenhouse-gases/
Despite all the talk about carbon capture, carbon footprints and carbon trading, carbon dioxide only causes nine to 26 percent of the greenhouse effect. That means that the majority of warming results from gases with a much lower media profile than the paparazzi-trailed starlet of global warming, CO2. In honor of last weeks' report in the Journal of Geophysical Research, which identified a brand new greenhouse gas, PopSci.com counts down the...
(2)
(0)
SGT Mary G.
Cpl (Join to see) - I'm with you on that. The more CO2 the plants use the more O2 they make. Planting more trees and gardens seems like a simple solution but it is a good part of the solution. Excellent share. Thanks for that.
It is impossible to not notice how many of the chemicals are fluoro and flurodie based? Decades ago refrigerant was changed so flurocarbons would not enlarge the ozone hole in the atmosphere - yet they are still being used and polluting.<sigh>
It is impossible to not notice how many of the chemicals are fluoro and flurodie based? Decades ago refrigerant was changed so flurocarbons would not enlarge the ozone hole in the atmosphere - yet they are still being used and polluting.<sigh>
(1)
(0)
Cpl (Join to see)
Global cooling was the buzz phrase in the 70's. The climate changes, it shifts with solar cycles, lunar cycles and the magnetic pole shifts. Those are three things that are not in the latest models and not a single person can affect those natural events. A tax will never alter nature. The only reason they are still being used was someone said "let's tax it and charge people a license fee to use it."
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google