Posted on Sep 5, 2021
ADPH warns of dangers of taking ivermectin to treat COVID-19
949
24
6
4
4
0
Edited 3 y ago
Posted 3 y ago
Responses: 4
People are taking ivermectin. That is foolish!
Even my horses did not like this. with most of them it was a battle to get it down their throats.
Take the damn vaccine!
Even my horses did not like this. with most of them it was a battle to get it down their throats.
Take the damn vaccine!
(3)
(0)
PO1 Robert P. really should’ve read the story first…
“ MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WSFA) - The Alabama Department of Public Health is warning consumers about the dangers of self-medicating with large quantities of ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19.
In Alabama, the number of calls to poison control centers from persons taking ivermectin have doubled from last year, according to ADPH…”
This isn’t about Oklahoma.
“ MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WSFA) - The Alabama Department of Public Health is warning consumers about the dangers of self-medicating with large quantities of ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19.
In Alabama, the number of calls to poison control centers from persons taking ivermectin have doubled from last year, according to ADPH…”
This isn’t about Oklahoma.
(2)
(0)
SFC Michael Hasbun
No, I originally posted the wrong link. He discredited a link that I discredited on Facebook. So I give him credit for it.
(3)
(0)
"You won't change their minds by being mean."
You won't change their minds by legitimizing their bullshit either.
Having a respectful public debate with someone who is spreading dangerous misinformation does nothing except legitimize their position to a neutral observer. Always keep in mind the neutral observers.
So, learn how you want to differentiate dangerous misinformation not worth legitimizing and stuff that's bullshit, but might be fun to engage. It's far less harmful to take a flat Earther seriously than it is to have an honest debate with a dude who says vaccines are a plot to kill people and his sources are all supplement shilling Holocaust deniers. Don't engage that fucker as if he's legitimate. Mock his bullshit arguments, sources, and personality if you want. Make sure a neutral observer knows this person isn't to be trusted, because they fucking can't. Their intentions are either malicious, or they've been brainwashed by someone with awful intentions. Stop the spread of their awful ideas.
You won't change their minds by legitimizing their bullshit either.
Having a respectful public debate with someone who is spreading dangerous misinformation does nothing except legitimize their position to a neutral observer. Always keep in mind the neutral observers.
So, learn how you want to differentiate dangerous misinformation not worth legitimizing and stuff that's bullshit, but might be fun to engage. It's far less harmful to take a flat Earther seriously than it is to have an honest debate with a dude who says vaccines are a plot to kill people and his sources are all supplement shilling Holocaust deniers. Don't engage that fucker as if he's legitimate. Mock his bullshit arguments, sources, and personality if you want. Make sure a neutral observer knows this person isn't to be trusted, because they fucking can't. Their intentions are either malicious, or they've been brainwashed by someone with awful intentions. Stop the spread of their awful ideas.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next