Judicial Watch: U.S. Capitol Police Tell Federal Court January 6 Disturbance Videos Are Not...

I'm not sure what this comment is supposed to mean. Is it a comparison of opposites? If so, what are the criteria? Is it an opinion regarding Judicial Watch? And if so, on what is it based? Or is it just a spontaneous comment... something to throw out there to spark discussion?

Where are you coming from with this comment?

Count the cameras in and around each of the DC buildings. There are literally thousands. Average 4-6 hours per camera to see if anything happened before and during and voila - 14,000+ hours of video.

My understanding is that the District of Columbia in general has a greater concentration of surveillance cameras than any other location on this side of the Atlantic. High-profile "target" buildings such as the U.S. Capitol, the White House, and just about any terminus for the underground tunnel network(s) will have an even higher concentration of cameras.
The request is for all video recorded during a 9-hour period, so 14,000 hours equates to "only" 1,500 cameras.

Ok, that makes sense.

Interesting but wrong, SSgt (Join to see).
Let me share few words from the U.S. Constitution with you, SSG Edward Tilton:
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort."
I'll leave it as an exercise for the sergeant to look up the legal definitions of insurrection, seditious conspiracy, and advocating the violent overthrow of the government.

1LT William Clardy -

se·di·tion
noun
conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.

in·sur·rec·tion
noun: insurrection; plural noun: insurrections
a violent uprising against an authority or government.

I find the definition of insurrection to be especially illuminating. While the J6 protest did have a small modicum of violence involved, per all legal definitions, it comes nowhere close to the level of violence in all the BLM and Antifa protests (riots!) we were all witness to over more than a year's worth of time. In fact, they are still going on.
Shut down a cop shop? Insurrection!
Attack a Federal Building? Insurrection!
Require the Natl Guard and/or DC Police to be able to walk to a church "across the street"? Insurrection!

Nobody wants to talk about the insurrection from the left and everyone wants to blow up J6 as a world ending event.

<smh!/>

Actually, the de facto legal standard for insurrection is a lot lower than most folks realize, SSgt (Join to see).
Think about every riot where federal troops have been deployed (or the National Guard federalized) upon a governor's request. Then consider that the request contains 2 key parts: a declaration that a local state of insurrection exists, and a further declaration that the state lacks the resources to put down the insurrection.

"10 U.S.C. §331. Federal aid for State governments
"Whenever there is an insurrections in any State against its government, the President may, upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be convened, call into Federal service such of the militia of the other States, in the number requested by that State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to suppress the insurrection."

Hmm. If the riot on the 6th of January by maybe 200-300 - let's call it 500-1000 to exaggerate - ACTUAL "rioters" (who didn't burn down anything), a number of which got into the Capitol, some led - as shown on video - by known antifa activists, and - of course - at least one self-professed "shaman" (who probably needs to have his head examined), is labeled (for convenient propaganda purposes) as an "insurrection", what do you call the antifa riots (some of which were called BLM riots, but which I suspect were really "false-flag" antifa riots) which left over a billion dollars in property damage, to include many small businesses and city sections gutted by fire?