Avatar feed
Responses: 3
LT Brad McInnis
6
6
0
LTC Kevin B. Not on this topic, but... I wanted to publicly thank you for your help this weekend with one of ours who was having problems. Your help was above and beyond, and much appreciated. Thank you !
(6)
Comment
(0)
LTC Kevin B.
LTC Kevin B.
>1 y
Always glad to assist. That takes precedence over everything else.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Erik Marquez
3
3
0
"the science of gun violence (by those aged 18-20)" Is is not science. the data is accurate, the conclusions published from that data wrong.
A law banning hand gun purchases from a dealer to those 21 and older has no impact on 18-20 years old's committing violence with a gun as the majority of that demographic are not sourcing their guns from a licensed firearms dealer.
(3)
Comment
(0)
LTC Kevin B.
LTC Kevin B.
>1 y
Unless you're a data analytics expert who is familiar with the methodology and empirical techniques they used in their research, it's quite a reach to assert that their conclusions are wrong. It's fair to say that you disagree with their conclusions, or that their conclusions haven't convinced you to support their policy recommendations, but calling them wrong is quite the leap of faith.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SGM Erik Marquez
SGM Erik Marquez
>1 y
LTC Kevin B. - Fair enough....
Im a non professional analytics person , that has done research on two "scientific" research articles. Read reviews and reports about them, in support and against. And have come to the opinion the conclusion being forwarded from them are incorrect.

I will invest the time and effort to look up the data and research mentioned that was used to justify the original 1968 law
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Les Darbison
0
0
0
I commented on this post. Where did it go?
(0)
Comment
(0)
LTC Kevin B.
LTC Kevin B.
>1 y
No idea.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close