Posted on May 25, 2021
What Ted Cruz doesn’t understand about those ‘woke’ Army recruiting commercials
1.8K
21
22
5
5
0
Despite Cruz’s claim that Cpl. Emma Malonelord’s story of growing up with two mothers before joining the Army is an example of a “woke, emasculated military,” the truth is that we need more patriotic Americans like her willing to serve in our armed forces — and fewer ignorant politicians like Cruz making their job harder.
“There are different issues that we face with recruiting,” said Laura DeFrancisco, a spokesperson for Army marketing. “A lot of people don’t even think about the Army as an option,” she said.
“There are different issues that we face with recruiting,” said Laura DeFrancisco, a spokesperson for Army marketing. “A lot of people don’t even think about the Army as an option,” she said.
What Ted Cruz doesn’t understand about those ‘woke’ Army recruiting commercials
Posted from taskandpurpose.comPosted in these groups: 
Recruiting
Ted Cruz
Recruiting Ted Cruz
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 5
5
5
0
3
3
0
he learned from the orange man. anyone remember him calling service members "losers" while actually in Arlington National Cemetery, standing right next to a retired soldier who lost his soldier son in combat?
(3)
(0)
MAJ Ron Peery
SrA John Monette - He looks bad only to those who have already decided he is bad. You would be rejected to sit on a jury trying him for any crime because you already have a prejudice against him, and you have made public statements to that effect. In addition, anonymous testimony is not proof in a court of law. Even cases where the identity of the witness or victim is protected, their identity is still revealed to the judge and attorneys on both sides. Your standard seems to be similar to Berea's
"Show me the man and I will give you the crime." Finally, if there is one anonymous "witness" and multiple identified witnesses who refute the "witness's" claim, I'm inclined to write off the anonymous claim. Hint: adding extra letters to a word is not the best way to emphasize it. If there are so many things that make him look bad, add a few to your narrative. That will allow a useful debate. Otherwise it's just a statement of your opinion without supporting facts. One "o" in "so" is enough. You might also work on punctuation and capitalization.
"Show me the man and I will give you the crime." Finally, if there is one anonymous "witness" and multiple identified witnesses who refute the "witness's" claim, I'm inclined to write off the anonymous claim. Hint: adding extra letters to a word is not the best way to emphasize it. If there are so many things that make him look bad, add a few to your narrative. That will allow a useful debate. Otherwise it's just a statement of your opinion without supporting facts. One "o" in "so" is enough. You might also work on punctuation and capitalization.
(0)
(0)
SrA John Monette
MAJ Ron Peery - He's only out for himself. He will willingly throw his children under the bus if it means he doesn't get prosecuted. And I suppose the comments he made to General Kelly, while standing at Kelly's son's grave in Arlington, are fake news too.
(0)
(0)
MAJ Ron Peery
SrA John Monette - What comment is that? Oh, I found it. Another batch of anonymous people making an accusation, while Gen Kelly has apparently never commented on it. Just another hit piece written by an author and published in a periodical, both of which are notoriously anti-Trump.
(0)
(0)
1
0
1
With this generation filled with slackers and entitled babies that want to be spoon fed everything and are worried more about their feelings than anything tangible like freedom, not to mention growing up being taught to hate America and its values, you really need to target that small percentage that are serious about military service and take it the way it should be taken. Think about it, do you want a bunch of woke crybabies worried about being offended and triggered by something as simple as stiff sheets or any other of a million trivial things to be sent to war against an army of ANY other country? Or do you want hardedned tough solidiers to fight other country's hardened, tough soldiers? You send a bunch of woke crybabies into battle with a bunch of hardened, trained, and serious soldiers, you will learn fast and hard the only true answer to that question. I would rather us not get to that place where we find out the hard way. Thus, this commercial is a disaster to us as a nation. You think these other countries are not over there laughing their asses off at us? You are in denial. They are waiting, biding their time for us to be destroyed from within and having a good old time watching it happen.
(1)
(1)
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
I thought I had the old many yelling at a cloud meme but I can't find it - but that's what I think of when I read your post. "BaCk iN mY dAY" is probably something you say a lot huh? Also this post is from May - way to revive a dead thread.
I'd rather be around the people I am now than the toxic, ignorant, misogynistic, racist f* heads that I was around when I first came in.
I'd rather be around the people I am now than the toxic, ignorant, misogynistic, racist f* heads that I was around when I first came in.
(1)
(1)
SSgt (Join to see)
For calling people names in a rude and non rules compliance:
Lewd Content and Vulgarity: RallyPoint has a zero tolerance policy for posting lewd content and vulgarity on RallyPoint or sending it to other RallyPoint members through messages.
Personal Attacks: RallyPoint does not allow members to launch personal attacks on other members. This includes a pattern of retaliatory down voting, repeated harassment, slanderous statements, etc.
And this is coming from a jarhead.
Lewd Content and Vulgarity: RallyPoint has a zero tolerance policy for posting lewd content and vulgarity on RallyPoint or sending it to other RallyPoint members through messages.
Personal Attacks: RallyPoint does not allow members to launch personal attacks on other members. This includes a pattern of retaliatory down voting, repeated harassment, slanderous statements, etc.
And this is coming from a jarhead.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google