Avatar feed
Responses: 2
SFC Casey O'Mally
3
3
0
Non-compliance should come with penalties - but penalties to people, not programs. (Unless it is something like a contract program which is not meeting its contractual requirements.)

A unit doesn't produce the required data? Commander is relieved.
A unit has faulty data? Data maintainer is relieved. Maybe Commander, too.
A unit is committing fraud? Fraudster(s) are relieved. Probably Commander, too.

Start firing people, and people will start complying. Do nothing other than write a report, no one will truly give a damn.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Don VandeBogert
0
0
0
Not for nothing...but...some auditors are idiots. I've been through a couple audits and the auditors couldn't see past their own agendas when you laid the facts and numbers, to the penny, in front of them.
Granted, I was only dealing with fleets in the low 9, high 8 digit values, but still. The audits were a joke. And its difficult answer in the affimitive to problems that didn't exist before an auditor created one on paper.

Now...the DoD, yeah I'd bet there's some funny math going on and shouldn't be. There has to be a goal at the end, and a sustainable one at that. Seems the people that run these big programs and are responsible parties are changed out too frequently. It's like a game of hot potato. New person comes in and the old problems are ignored knowing they won't be around long enough to care or make positive changes.

V/R
Bogie
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close