Posted on Mar 10, 2021
Fox News host Tucker Carlson calls pregnant women in US armed services a "mockery of our...
699
22
12
4
4
0
Tucker Carlson is a vile, disgusting excuse of a human being. Nothing he says is ever based in fact. Fox News, in fact, won a lawsuit by saying that no one takes him seriously.
However, the simple fact that this "man" can have a show where he sits there and calls the women in the US military a "mockery" and still have a job, not have anyone in the Pentagon denounce him and not have any outrage from conservatives (none that I've seen on social media) reeks of his privilege.
I guarantee he would NEVER say this to ANY of our faces. Ever.
However, the simple fact that this "man" can have a show where he sits there and calls the women in the US military a "mockery" and still have a job, not have anyone in the Pentagon denounce him and not have any outrage from conservatives (none that I've seen on social media) reeks of his privilege.
I guarantee he would NEVER say this to ANY of our faces. Ever.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson calls pregnant women in US armed services a "mockery of our...
Posted from salon.comPosted in these groups: 
Media
Media
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 5
3
3
0
2
2
0
Here you go dipshits that agree with him - here's the video of him saying that women are making a mockery of the military:
https://twitter.com/NikkiMcR/status/ [login to see] 78042881
The disdain in his voice from the start. The condescension.
Nowhere did anyone say pregnant women will be "fighting wars." WE CAN'T DEPLOY WHEN WE ARE PREGNANT! We are nondeployable. So no women aren't going to be pregnant flying jets and bombing anything. So he's wrong there.
The hair changes are beneficial to us and will help us to be more effective.
I don't expect Tucker Carlson to understand since he's never served. I do expect males who have served to understand and to not defend this sniveling pile of shit. But then again, I shouldn't be surprised seeing the way some males in the military treat females the last 17 years I've been in and how women were treated before that.
There is no "feminization" of the US military. At all. So if you watch that and you agree with him, you're a disgusting POS yourself and you are a disgrace to the military. Even if you're no longer in.
https://twitter.com/NikkiMcR/status/ [login to see] 78042881
The disdain in his voice from the start. The condescension.
Nowhere did anyone say pregnant women will be "fighting wars." WE CAN'T DEPLOY WHEN WE ARE PREGNANT! We are nondeployable. So no women aren't going to be pregnant flying jets and bombing anything. So he's wrong there.
The hair changes are beneficial to us and will help us to be more effective.
I don't expect Tucker Carlson to understand since he's never served. I do expect males who have served to understand and to not defend this sniveling pile of shit. But then again, I shouldn't be surprised seeing the way some males in the military treat females the last 17 years I've been in and how women were treated before that.
There is no "feminization" of the US military. At all. So if you watch that and you agree with him, you're a disgusting POS yourself and you are a disgrace to the military. Even if you're no longer in.
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
Tucker makes more sense than Joe Biden, you know, the guy ho runs the thing! I actually watched that show and he was not calling pregnant military members a mockery, he was referring to Joe Biden deciding maternal flight suits were important. There is a Marine who does worse than Tucker on mocking a women concerned about body armor, length of stride in marching, women’s pants, etc posted on RP
(2)
(0)
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
LT Brad McInnis - I 100% watched what he said about women in the military. At the time I searched it, it was between Salon and some other site I can't remember.
But he said that maternity flight uniforms are a mockery. That Biden is making a mockery of the military by "feminizing" it with the changes in female hair regulations. However, no President has any say or control in a service's regulations. The changes were long overdue. And in no way, shape or form is any of the changes a "mockery" nor are any of us a mockery.
The fact that ANY OF YOU are defending or agreeing with Tucker Carlson in this speaks fucking VOLUMES about you and how you were as servicemembers. Thank fucking goodness you're no longer in.
But he said that maternity flight uniforms are a mockery. That Biden is making a mockery of the military by "feminizing" it with the changes in female hair regulations. However, no President has any say or control in a service's regulations. The changes were long overdue. And in no way, shape or form is any of the changes a "mockery" nor are any of us a mockery.
The fact that ANY OF YOU are defending or agreeing with Tucker Carlson in this speaks fucking VOLUMES about you and how you were as servicemembers. Thank fucking goodness you're no longer in.
(1)
(0)
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
LTC David Brown - I replied to that and watched the video that guy was responding to. Some of what she said were valid concerns for women like body armor made for men that we have had to wear (ill fitting body armor) but the lady was wrong about pants. We don't have zippers on our pants. And I think the guy yelling and screaming didn't help himself either. So I did comment on that if you would go and read it. But of course not, you're too busy supporting Tucker Fucking Carlson. The most privileged person possibly on Fox News. What the fuck does this have to do with Joe Biden? Smh.
(1)
(0)
LTC David Brown
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff - Clearly Carlson is talking about Biden’s emphasis on maternity uniforms for flight crews and female uniforms etc while China is aggressively expanding it’s military. Women make up 14.4% of the military. Do women need uniforms and equipment to meet their needs? Yes, of course. Should that be our emphasis? No Solon is third rate and highly biased.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google