Avatar feed
Responses: 4
SP5 Nuclear Weapons Specialist
2
2
0
I'm all for helping/supporting Americans. I have a real problem with all the money going to other countries. That in my opinion is not covid relief.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Casey O'Mally
0
0
0
This. Is. Not. A. Coronavirus. Relief. Bill.

It is a pork barrel FULL of special interest and non-COVID related spending with some COVID stuff thrown in to make it sound like Democrats are trying to help the everyday American while pushing through a wishlist, and to give them sound bites to talk about how Republicans "don't want to help the American people."

And it got struck down again, but PLEASE tell me, Sen Sanders, how jacking the minimum relief way up will HELP with your what the President and his mouthpiece (Psaki) kept harping on - jobs and unemployment. How does RAISING the cost of labor help create jobs and get more people back to work?

The liberals in Washington can't even focus on working realistic solutions to fixing fixable problems. They want to do everything at once. Yes, when "everything is broken" everything needs to be fixed (I would argue very strongly that everything is NOT broken, but I am operating off the assumption that the liberal believe it is, and are working from that perspective). But any manager / leader / executive worth even HALF a shit understands that in order to make progress, you have to prioritize and fix the most important things FIRST before moving on to other things. When you try do everything at once, either you get everything done - in a substandard manner which is often worse than just leaving it alone - or you get nothing done.

Identify the top two or three priorities that need to be addressed NOW (I would argue jobless benefits, finding a way to juice the labor market, and help to SMALL business, but that is just me) and pass a smaller, focused bill which addresses those needs. Once it is passed, THEN tackle the next two or three problems, with a smaller, focused relief bill - and make sure that second bill either does not counteract the first one OR counteracts only portions of the first bill which have served their purpose and effectively stabilized the focal point (i.e. don't create job incentives to get unemployment down and then raise the cost of labor which will drive unemployment back up - or at least slow or stagnate the drop in unemployment).


When everything is a priority, nothing is. Essentially, the liberals in Washington are telling us we are not a priority.

(And yes, I am a Conservative - though not a Republican. But I would be - and have been - equally critical of Conservative plans. I was quite critical of the Trump era tax cuts, for instance. It just so happens that this particular spending package is being pushed, campaigned for, supported, and sponsored by liberals.)
(0)
Comment
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
SFC Casey O'Mally
>1 y
A1C Michael Allen - I don't think they practice math at all.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Robert Perrotto
0
0
0
so - riddle me this - if $1600 goes to 70 million eligible Americans, where is the other 80% of the $1.9 trillion going?
(0)
Comment
(0)
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
>1 y
You can Google this.
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close