9
9
0
So much truth in such a short amount of time...
Missing tags:
#Judicial Branch, #Executive Branch, #Legislative Branch
Missing tags:
#Judicial Branch, #Executive Branch, #Legislative Branch
Posted in these groups: 
Supreme CourtUS Congress
Office of the President (POTUS)
Administrative Chief
Supreme CourtUS Congress Office of the President (POTUS) Administrative Chief
Posted 4 y ago
Responses: 6
7
7
0
She speaks of the difficulty of firing a government employee. Have those on the right not looked at the reason for this? One of the major components of a successful government is continuity. If every time the administration changed hands all the employees were fired and new people brought in, it would be a disaster. We had examples of that somewhat under Trump.
Bottom line, as I have said before:
Our system of government is terrible, but it beats the hell out of whatever is in second place!
Bottom line, as I have said before:
Our system of government is terrible, but it beats the hell out of whatever is in second place!
(7)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
You are right, there are federal reserve at other positions that are trans governmental that last 5 or 10 years. You have a good point here.
(0)
(0)
6
6
0
Complete and utter BS. That's like the Board of directors of Boeing firing everyone that works for the for them and doing all of the engineering,R&D, construction and handle all legal matters.
This woman is down right stupid and everyone that agrees are just as bad.
This woman is down right stupid and everyone that agrees are just as bad.
(6)
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
Thank you for calling me stupid. You are a ray of sunshine in the Unity movement.
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
You are entitled to your opinion but you just reminded me about something funny about Boeing. I think using the company of Boeing is not appropriate considering it is as scandalous as Washington DC.
https://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bal-te.bz.boeing08mar08-story.html
You didn't give a counter argument you just made an analogy about bowing but you didn't refute point by point what the narrator was saying. I think you could be more convincing if you could do it that way.
CWO3 (Join to see) SPC Joshua Blotzer A1C Michael Allen SFC Kelly Fuerhoff SFC Kelly Fuerhoff MSgt David Hoffman MSG Stan Hutchison 1SG (Join to see) CW4 Guy Butler
https://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bal-te.bz.boeing08mar08-story.html
You didn't give a counter argument you just made an analogy about bowing but you didn't refute point by point what the narrator was saying. I think you could be more convincing if you could do it that way.
CWO3 (Join to see) SPC Joshua Blotzer A1C Michael Allen SFC Kelly Fuerhoff SFC Kelly Fuerhoff MSgt David Hoffman MSG Stan Hutchison 1SG (Join to see) CW4 Guy Butler
(0)
(0)
5
5
0
It sounds like you’re advocating a return to the patronage system instituted under Andrew Jackson, where political loyalty is more important than knowledge or expertise. Not sure that’s a good way to go.
That’s what existed before Civil Service, btw...
That’s what existed before Civil Service, btw...
(5)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google