Posted on Jan 23, 2021
Race, Politics, and Chaos in the Capitol: The Election of 1876
207
6
2
4
4
0
Why is compromise considered honorable or even desirable? How many in 2020 compromised their principles to replace a bad man with good policies for a bad man with bad policies?
Race, Politics, and Chaos in the Capitol: The Election of 1876
Posted from digpodcast-org.cdn.ampproject.orgPosted in these groups: 
Elections
Elections
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
2
2
0
Likely because most compromise doesn't involve deeply held principles. Most policies are not on the same level of principles as things like inhumanity, racism, disregard for the nation, etc as the "bad man" (aka 45) embodied.
If Trump were a democrat and I agreed with every single one of his policies I still would have kicked him to the curb, because he was a danger to the country. Policies are not worth compromising ethics for.
If Trump were a democrat and I agreed with every single one of his policies I still would have kicked him to the curb, because he was a danger to the country. Policies are not worth compromising ethics for.
(2)
(0)
0
0
0
Compromise for the sake of compromise isn't strength, it's weakness. Violating principle to fit in or be liked is a losing proposition.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google