Posted on Dec 9, 2020
Appeals court rules for Trump taking military money for wall
658
16
12
4
4
0
Posted 4 y ago
Responses: 1
SGT Edward Wilcox
CSM Chuck Stafford If you are ok with harming military families for the good of a racist ideology, the you were never on the "high ground". That money was earmarked for housing and schools. Hardly "non-essential". Not to mention the fact that he is subverting the will of Congress, and violating a law he signed, in order to placate his base. Not a worthy exchange, in my book.
(0)
(0)
CSM Chuck Stafford
SGT Edward Wilcox - Hardly racist if it saves money for Americans of all races -- If any families were left without homes or schooling, I'm willing to bet the media would have been all over it, but crickets... and as the title states the court sides with the POTUS.
(0)
(0)
SGT Edward Wilcox
CSM Chuck Stafford Then you don't understand what the meaning of the word is. Doesn't matter if the court sides with ex-potus, it's still wrong. They weren't deprived of homes or schools, but they were deprived of BETTER homes and schools.
(2)
(0)
CSM Chuck Stafford
SGT Edward Wilcox - I scoff in your general direction at your personal attacks -- I know precisely what racism is as I check most boxes on the census, and the one I don't - my kids do.... I still remain on the moral high ground and my overton window remains unchanged. -- If it's any consolation, he's only Potus for another month, take a knee and enjoy the holidays.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next