Trump: Leaders Called on Election Night to Congratulate, Then Votes Came in 'Dumps'

CPT Jack Durish - What evidence? The Trump campaign has yet to provide any to any judge in any lawsuit. So please if you have this smoking gun evidence, share it.

SFC Kelly Fuerhoff - Hundreds of sworn affidavits have been filed. Bogus ballots are being examined. I know that most media are running away from this story but there are a few reputable sources reporting it. Of course you're going to ask for me to provide links and then will claim that they are not reputable. So, go find your own. Don't look at the NY Times or the Washington Post and dismiss the allegations because they either won't report them or are attempting to discredit them.

Capt Gregory Prickett - You of all people should understand what a cumbersome legal process this is going to be. Remember the Gore v Bush affair and how long that took even though it was just one state? And they wasn't really fraud. This is fraud. I'm willing to concede that you are not looking at this objectively inasmuch as you have a different ideological point of view. I am not arguing this on behalf of President Trump. I am solely interested in exposing the fraud for our sake and the sake of the election process. I lived through it here in California in the 2018 midterms during which the Democratic party experimented with ballot harvesting. We went to bed that November election evening with GOP candidates winning in solid GOP Congressional Districts only to wake up the next morning to learn that almost all had lost. Their seats had been flipped when harvested ballots arrived in the middle of the night. Sound familiar? It's the same thing that happened in this year's Presidential election. When we complained we learned only then that our Democratic supermajority in the State Legislature and governor's mansion had made ballot harvesting legal. They weren't about to suffer another surprise like the one that defeated Hillary.

And Gregory, competent evidence is being produced. It has been sufficient for at least one state to decertify their election. There will be others...

CPT Jack Durish The only one not looking at this objectively is you, and the other Trumpers insisting their is fraud. The sources you are using are not credible, mostly because they are sources of propoganda for the extreme right. Stop listening to the echo chambers and realize that there is no credible evidence. If there were, it would have been presented in court by now.

Bush v Gore, in 2000, took a month, and was improperly taken over by the Supreme Court. This will take longer for less reason.

That Devil is coming for you

CPT Jack Durish - I doubt it. He is still busy trying to prove he won the election.

MSG Stan Hutchison - You are so predictable. As I said, you believe that President Trump is the Devil, witness your statement "He is still busy trying to prove he won the election." And you will happily turn your back on the evidence even if it means your ideological comrades will be the target of election fraud the next time around

CPT Jack Durish - As Greg posted, where's the evidence?

Remember how long it took for the Bush v Gore election to play out? That was only one state...

CPT Jack Durish - Bush v. Gore was about process; primarily the size and scope of the recounts and the procedures used to analyze votes. Neither candidate questioned the validity of the election, alleged massive fraud, or made baseless allegations without proof. Both candidates both largely let the process play out in courts, and did not attempt to circumvent the process. Conversely, in 2020, one candidate has made innumerable allegations of fraud with evidence that has not held up in court, has attacked the integrity of the election, the courts, and his own administration's justice department, and has attempted to short circuit the process by pressuring state legislatures to ignore election results.