Posted on Nov 24, 2020
The Stolen Election, Pt. 2: Hiding Biden Laptop Scandal Reveals More Frightening Social Plan
565
52
25
7
7
0
Everything in this video is factually true but truth isn't the issue. The issue at hand in this election is results and sadly, too many Americans would rather accept the results than fight for their freedom. Fortunately, we have a President who is willing to fight for us. On the one hand, we need a President to fight for us because we are unwilling to fight for ourselves. On the other hand, there is a segment of the population is happy to accept the results regardless of how dishonestly they were gained.
Posted in these groups: 
Election 2020
Election 2020
Posted 4 y ago
Responses: 9
5
5
0
Nope, wrong on all counts. The laptop was not hidden, did not have the information it supposedly had, and the results of the election are undisputable.
(5)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
There is so much in this video that has nothing to do with the Hunter Biden story but you keep on creating your own truth. Better that you ignore reality
(0)
(0)
5
5
0
Hunter Biden laptop again?
The sources for the debunked story were Rudy Giuliani and Steve Bannon. The former is a laughing stock based on ineptitude from multiple Trump campaign election lawsuits being dismissed. The latter got indicted for fraud over fundraising for private border wall
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/08/obamagate-hunter-biden-laptop-434984
The sources for the debunked story were Rudy Giuliani and Steve Bannon. The former is a laughing stock based on ineptitude from multiple Trump campaign election lawsuits being dismissed. The latter got indicted for fraud over fundraising for private border wall
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/08/obamagate-hunter-biden-laptop-434984
How 'Obamagate' and Hunter’s 'laptop from hell' fizzled
The Logan Act. Burisma. Tony Bobulinski. John Brennan. Unmasking. The Durham probe. They were all on Trump’s last-ditch Bingo card, flummoxing voters.
(5)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
Debunked? I love it. Hunter's laptop from hell fizzled because the propagandists threw water on it, copious amounts of water to drown it. And it appears you drowned in it...
(1)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff - Right. You just keep on telling yourself that and, for God's sake, don't watch the video. It's better that you jump into that pit without looking
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
To date we’ve had Trump’s legal team invoke Communist money, bribing of Republican state officials and judges, Venezuela’s Chavez and CIA connection, only Black communities votes thrown out, and in Pennsylvania only the 7 million votes impacting the top of the ballot should be thrown out but keep the results of the down ballot.
Yeah in 2016 Americans voiced their disapproval in the streets just like in 2008 Americans voiced their disapproval as well. 2016 they felt foreign interference and GOP bogus investigations stole the election. 2008 they insist Obama was illegitimate and should be obstructed. So here we are, 2020 and they want to believe only in person votes should count and mail in ballots have always been rife with fraud.
Sometimes reality is hard to swallow. Americans elected a Black man twice. HRC was more hated than Trump. Highest turnout in American history occurred in 2020 as result of the pandemic and dislike of Trump.
Yeah in 2016 Americans voiced their disapproval in the streets just like in 2008 Americans voiced their disapproval as well. 2016 they felt foreign interference and GOP bogus investigations stole the election. 2008 they insist Obama was illegitimate and should be obstructed. So here we are, 2020 and they want to believe only in person votes should count and mail in ballots have always been rife with fraud.
Sometimes reality is hard to swallow. Americans elected a Black man twice. HRC was more hated than Trump. Highest turnout in American history occurred in 2020 as result of the pandemic and dislike of Trump.
(4)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
Great rant! However, it is totally nonresponsive to the content of the video (which, I suspect, you didn't watch)
(0)
(0)
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
CPT Jack Durish - You never have anything to provide to have any reasonable debate. Ever. When people disagree with you, it's a "rant." Smh.
(1)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff - That is an interesting criticism. Disrespectful too. There was no fraud in 2016. There wasn't any need for the Democrats to defraud the election process. They were absolutely confident of their position to win. And we had three+ years of investigations showing conclusively that the Republicans didn't do anything illegal. (I could have told them that. The GOP is too stupid) As for claims that President Obama was an illegitimate candidate, that had nothing to do with voting. It was based on idiot claims that he wasn't a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution. So, let's agree. Americans elected a Black man twice. (keeping in mind that he couldn't have been elected by Blacks alone - white folk voted for him too) Hillary was more hated than Trump. Well, to be fair, President Trump wasn't hated until he won. That brings us to 2020. No one has yet won. There is credible evidence of fraud and the election won't be decided until that evidence is litigated. THAT is reality. Now, as to my assertion that your initial response was a "rant". I still contend that it was because it was not in anyway responsive to the content of the video. My posting merely provided you with a "trigger" to rant your own opinion. On my part, I stand by my assertion that the video is factual/truthful and I stand prepared to defend its assertions. It you care to debate respectfully, I will respond in kind.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google