Avatar feed
Responses: 6
SGT Gregory Cole
3
3
0
Kavanaugh 2.0!!!
(3)
Comment
(0)
PO3 Patricia Miner
PO3 Patricia Miner
4 y
Which I believe was Thomas 2.0 and that was Bork 2.0.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Gregory Cole
SGT Gregory Cole
4 y
PO3 Patricia Miner I know Thomas was conservative, but I am not familiar with bork. Well I guess the politicians just hate the Justices with the whole appointed for life thing...
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Patricia Miner
PO3 Patricia Miner
4 y
SGT Gregory Cole Bork has become a verb because his hearing was so contentious. All are Republican nominees.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Gregory Cole
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LT Brad McInnis
2
2
0
They need to take the cameras out of these hearings. The Democrats have proven they can't handle the chance to make an idiot out of themselves....
(2)
Comment
(0)
PO3 Patricia Miner
PO3 Patricia Miner
4 y
Hilarious!!!
(0)
Reply
(0)
CSM Chuck Stafford
CSM Chuck Stafford
4 y
Cameras reinforce that sentiment and provided video proof for years to come
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Byron Oyler
2
2
0
How many people on this letter would say 'No thanks" to a Supreme Court nomination?
(2)
Comment
(0)
PO3 Patricia Miner
PO3 Patricia Miner
4 y
None of them are even lawyers! They aren't qualified to "advise" her.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Byron Oyler
MAJ Byron Oyler
4 y
PO3 Patricia Miner - Is it a requirement in the Constitution to be a lawyer or judge to be on the Supreme Court?
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Patricia Miner
PO3 Patricia Miner
4 y
MAJ Byron Oyler No but all have been. That would definitely be a reason not to confirm someone. I can't see that ever happening today.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close