Avatar feed
Responses: 3
LCDR Joshua Gillespie
3
3
0
I have mixed feelings on this topic. On the one hand, I think cultural "ownership" is a fluid thing. It's impossible to "right all wrongs" committed centuries ago... and the esoteric value of having the ability to expose masses of the descendants of those who "conquer" to the art (and value) of the long-dead "conquered" may be higher than returning said items to the descendants of the same. On the other hand, we all draw deeply from our cultural past. I've never been to Scotland... but knowing that my roots run deep there "means something" to me. I think it must be a "case by case" process of evaluating whether (a) said artifacts will be as preserved, valued, and SEEN as they are in current hands, and (b) whether or not the transfer is being done in the spirit of friendship... not apology. Why is the latter important to me? Well primarily, I think it is patently absurd to ask people living today to "apologize" for things done before they were even born.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Engineering Consultant/Instructor
SFC (Join to see)
4 y
Interesting thinking and thought process. I tend to agree with you on the case by case basis.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Greg Henning
3
3
0
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel British did the same thing in Egypt.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Engineering Consultant/Instructor
1
1
0
Difficult decisions to make on ownership of items, many actions taken before we were born. Difficult to identify how some items were obtained and if parties were compensated. The process should be a formal evaluation and determination before any actions are taken. MHO
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close