Posted on Aug 19, 2020
Senate Report: Former Trump Aide Paul Manafort Shared Campaign Info With Russia
3.75K
133
70
8
8
0
Election 2020
Donald Trump
United States Senate
Russia
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 13
8
8
0
Isn't that the same guy that was fired by Trump who is now being used as a cudgel. The misinformation billowing from those that hate Trump is as bad as anything Pravda was putting out during the cold war. Now, I realize pravda was state owned, but our media is party owned, so I don't really see a difference. It's just sad that some people can't see the parallels.
(8)
(0)
SSgt Richard Kensinger
SPC Kevin Ford - Once again we see the persisting use of deflection, distraction and denigration of all fact-tellers.
Rich
Rich
(3)
(0)
Cpl (Join to see)
You leftists keep thinking that. It's not my fault you can't see your "party first" attitude is your problem, not ours.
(2)
(0)
Cpl (Join to see)
Russia sowed discord in our election process, not a person, not a party. It appears it worked, good job falling for it harold!
(1)
(0)
7
7
0
We already knew this and it’s nice to see the GOP led Senate committee admit to this and other actions by associates and former members of the Trump campaign in 2016.
Note Right Wing media still says Trump campaign didn’t collude with Russia but we know individuals within Trump’s circle coordinated with WikiLeaks whom is accused of being the middle man.
At end of the day, we have foreign intel ops from Russia, China, and Iran actively engaging in operations to push disinformation a notable percentage of Americans are still willing to believe anything they read on social media without skepticism or fact checking. Very disappointing indeed.
Note Right Wing media still says Trump campaign didn’t collude with Russia but we know individuals within Trump’s circle coordinated with WikiLeaks whom is accused of being the middle man.
At end of the day, we have foreign intel ops from Russia, China, and Iran actively engaging in operations to push disinformation a notable percentage of Americans are still willing to believe anything they read on social media without skepticism or fact checking. Very disappointing indeed.
(7)
(0)
SSgt Richard Kensinger
And all this foreign influence is more than welcomed by this Administration.
Rich
Rich
(2)
(0)
5
5
0
Sorry but I don't trust NPR. From this article you think that it must be illegal for campaign staff to speak with persons from other countries. The Democrats have done the same thing so where is the outrage. The Democrats have proven themselves to be duplicitous, so where is the outrage. Simple, NPR and the MSM have their own agenda and it doesn't require truth
(5)
(0)
SFC James Cameron
SPC Kevin Ford when you sit in on and participate in an Organizational Level Foreign Disclose brief, you realize there is no true non-hostile foreign power. There are many aspects that we do not and will not disclose to Allies.
(1)
(0)
SPC Kevin Ford
SFC James Cameron - You are likely doing a bit of equivocating over the term hostile. As I said, I agree all countries have their own interests, but not all countries are actively working against us, even if our interests sometimes diverge. They’re just not. The other side of your argument is that there are some countries we are willing to regularly share intel with, and some we are not.
If you don’t like the terms (pretty standard terms I might all) of hostile vs friendly, there must be some term you use to acknowledge that distinction.
If you don’t like the terms (pretty standard terms I might all) of hostile vs friendly, there must be some term you use to acknowledge that distinction.
(0)
(0)
SFC James Cameron
SPC Kevin Ford you’re right Brother I am drawing an equivocation between state actors actively working against National Interests and those that are not. I’m not disagreeing with or disliking the terminology.
There are still a great deal of things that we do not and will not disclose to Allied Nations. That is due to the potential for that information to be distributed in an unwanted or unintended manner. Yes, we readily share intelligence, but capabilities and limitations of certain equipment and training aspects are some of those areas that remain close-hold.
There are still a great deal of things that we do not and will not disclose to Allied Nations. That is due to the potential for that information to be distributed in an unwanted or unintended manner. Yes, we readily share intelligence, but capabilities and limitations of certain equipment and training aspects are some of those areas that remain close-hold.
(1)
(0)
SPC Kevin Ford
SFC James Cameron - I suspect at this point we are discussing semantics as we seem to agree on the underlying ideas. I can see your discomfort with the term.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google