Posted on Jun 29, 2020
AP sources: White House aware of Russian bounties in 2019
3.79K
62
61
13
13
0
This moron was briefed over a year ago. But setting that aside for a minute, he gets a daily intel briefing that he doesn’t bother to read.
AP sources: White House aware of Russian bounties in 2019
Posted from apnews.com
Donald Trump
Afghanistan
Russia
Vladimir Putin
Taliban
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 12
6
6
0
This article is horribly written and deliberately misleading. "He wasn't briefed because the Intel hasn't been fully verified." Fully verified doesn't mean "beyond a shadow of a doubt." It means verified. But the writing is intentionally set to crwate a situation where the WH is either A) obviously lying to cover POTUS or B) incompetent (maybe even both). When it is provably neither - just written to make it seem that way.
I worked Intel for quite a while. We were always EXCEPTIONALLY cautious of disseminating "raw" Intel. If it ain't been corroborated, it ain't true. Period. I don't care if Jesus hisself said it. You better have Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John verifying.
I worked Intel for quite a while. We were always EXCEPTIONALLY cautious of disseminating "raw" Intel. If it ain't been corroborated, it ain't true. Period. I don't care if Jesus hisself said it. You better have Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John verifying.
(6)
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
SFC Casey O'Mally - If the report hit his table and he chose to not read it, he has failed as the POTUS.
(0)
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
Capt Gregory Prickett If you tell your law professor that you often don't read your cases for the day, your law professor could not honestly tell the world that you had read a specific case based purely on the fact that it had been assigned.
It is a known fact that he does not read the full PDB. Therefore stating that he was briefed simply because it was included is a flat out fabrication.
Stating it qas included in his PDB and he *should* be aware is completely fair. Saying he *is* aware is an assumption which is not supported by fact.
It is a known fact that he does not read the full PDB. Therefore stating that he was briefed simply because it was included is a flat out fabrication.
Stating it qas included in his PDB and he *should* be aware is completely fair. Saying he *is* aware is an assumption which is not supported by fact.
(0)
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
MAJ Ken Landgren Dunno about that. I would have to assume that he has more reports "hit his table" in any given week than he has time to read. That is what a staff is for. Every Commander I met above the Company level flat out stated they don't read all of their e-mail. That is what they have a staff for. I would have to assume (I do not know for a fact, as I have never met a President, nor been in the WH) that POTUS gets a significantly larger volume of reports than a battalion commander.
Additionally, your view of "failure" seems to be rather narrow minded. Failing to read one report, no matter how critical, does not doom an entire Presidency to failure (as you seem to indicate). Failing to ACT once things are known is, in my opinion, a far greater sin than failing to KNOW sooner rather than later.
Additionally, your view of "failure" seems to be rather narrow minded. Failing to read one report, no matter how critical, does not doom an entire Presidency to failure (as you seem to indicate). Failing to ACT once things are known is, in my opinion, a far greater sin than failing to KNOW sooner rather than later.
(0)
(0)
5
5
0
CWO3 (Join to see)
It's an election year. Many distractions such as covid and unrest. This is all we are going to see from both sides for the next 4 months.
(2)
(0)
3
3
0
SSG (Join to see) White House? Trump? White House May have been Aware but What are any of those Yes Men and Women going to do? They were Hired to Tow the Line for Trump and Trump Only Believes what His Toadies on Fox and Putin Tell Him.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google