Avatar feed
Responses: 7
1SG Steven Imerman
7
7
0
It was a shame. Had the Germans conducted civilian targeted air attacks on the scale of the Allied bombing efforts, we would have tried their leaders for war crimes.
(7)
Comment
(0)
SFC John Lich
SFC John Lich
5 y
1SG Steven Imerman that’s what the Battle of Britain was about, to keep that from happening and then the Nazis were indiscriminately dropping V1 and V2 bombs on England maybe not to that extent but only because they didn’t have the capability. Like to add 3 quotes from Gen Curtis LeMay; There are no innocent civilians. It is their government and you are fighting a people, you are not trying to fight an armed force anymore. So it doesn't bother me so much to be killing the so-called innocent bystanders.

Killing Japanese didn't bother me very much at that time... I suppose if I had lost the war, I would have been tried as a war criminal.... Every soldier thinks something of the moral aspects of what he is doing. But all war is immoral and if you let that bother you, you're not a good soldier.

As far as casualties were concerned I think there were more casualties in the first attack on Tokyo with incendiaries than there were with the first use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. The fact that it's done instantaneously, maybe that's more humane than incendiary attacks, if you can call any war act humane. I don't, particularly, so to me there wasn't much difference. A weapon is a weapon and it really doesn't make much difference how you kill a man. If you have to kill him, well, that's the evil to start with and how you do it becomes pretty secondary. I think your choice should be which weapon is the most efficient and most likely to get the whole mess over with as early as possible.
Not trying to take a side, just trying to show the different aspects of morality and war.
(3)
Reply
(0)
1SG Steven Imerman
1SG Steven Imerman
5 y
Understood, the moral judgements are very slanted by which side one is on. We hammered the foul Germans for unrestricted submarine warfare in two world wars, yet waged exactly that on all vessels anywhere near Japanese waters. And never condemned the Brits for the extensive and illegal use of Q ships, which forced the U boats to attack without surfacing or warning.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Jim Belanus
Sgt Jim Belanus
5 y
Germany and japan lost and to the victor goes the spoils. if they won there would be no trials just firing squads or sameri swords
(2)
Reply
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
4 y
They did starting in 1936 at Guernica and followed that up with far worse in eastern Europe. The only thing that kept them then from pulling things like Dresden in Berlin was your inability to technically pull it off.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW3 Harvey K.
6
6
0
My mother had a set of chinaware made in Dresden. She always described it as irreplaceable, because Dresden was destroyed.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
6
6
0
I did an oral report on this during AFROTC.
(6)
Comment
(0)
SPC Michael Duricko, Ph.D
SPC Michael Duricko, Ph.D
4 y
Any way to post a synopsis of your report?
(2)
Reply
(0)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
4 y
SPC Michael Duricko, Ph.D Hey that was 1967, synopsis is I passed. :-)
(2)
Reply
(0)
SPC Michael Duricko, Ph.D
SPC Michael Duricko, Ph.D
4 y
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen Never doubted for a second that you wouldn't pass.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close