Posted on Jan 30, 2020
Trump's 'peace plan' is beyond insulting. That's deliberate | Yousef Munayyer
350
4
6
3
3
0
Edited 5 y ago
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 3
Sadly, they are being treated better than they deserve.
1. Its not their land
2. Israel isn't required to care
3. They need to take their lot up with the U.N.
Prior to leaving Hong Kong, the United Kingdom was required to issue passports to Hong Konger's not wishing to become Communist Chinese. That's cuz UK was the last owner. Palestinians were last owned by the UK again. So sadly, the UK is who needs to be brokering the process and resettling the Palestinian folk. The land in it's whole was ceded to the nation of Israel by the UN. So sadly, the manner in which Israel governs *ITS* land, is moot.
1. Its not their land
2. Israel isn't required to care
3. They need to take their lot up with the U.N.
Prior to leaving Hong Kong, the United Kingdom was required to issue passports to Hong Konger's not wishing to become Communist Chinese. That's cuz UK was the last owner. Palestinians were last owned by the UK again. So sadly, the UK is who needs to be brokering the process and resettling the Palestinian folk. The land in it's whole was ceded to the nation of Israel by the UN. So sadly, the manner in which Israel governs *ITS* land, is moot.
(0)
(0)
Suspended Profile
...that’s an interesting interpretation...
PO3 Donald Murphy
If the land Israel was living in, was land that they conquered, then people have an argument. But the land was given to the displaced holocaust survivors by the UN. Its sad that the UN did not properly empty the land prior to giving it away, but again, that's not Israel's problem. The UN should have re-housed the folk living there.
As Europe was already doing what we said anyway to garner bunches of those Marshall Plan dollars, I am really exasperated that we just didn't demand that they take all of their liberated Jewish citizens back. I mean really - I'm a liberated Dutch Jew - why wouldn't I want to go back home to Holland? Etc. Had the USA/UN just done that to begin with, there would be no need for Israel.
As Europe was already doing what we said anyway to garner bunches of those Marshall Plan dollars, I am really exasperated that we just didn't demand that they take all of their liberated Jewish citizens back. I mean really - I'm a liberated Dutch Jew - why wouldn't I want to go back home to Holland? Etc. Had the USA/UN just done that to begin with, there would be no need for Israel.
(0)
(0)
I noted too many assumption's and slanted views in this article to have much value. Still an interesting read.
(0)
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel I am going to say something that will probably make a lot of members seeth at me. I stand firm in my Faith's belief that Israel is God's chosen people and that his promise to Abraham for his descendants will be fulfilled. The Jewish and Muslim (Bedoines) turmoil has already been ordained. Those who defend Israel are walking in Hashiem's (Ywhw, Jehovah God) Divine plan. But this is just the Faith I adhere.
(0)
(0)
LT Charles Baird
PO3 Phyllis Maynard Actually those "Jews" in the "State of Israel" are not the descendants of Jacob(Israel); They are Ashkenazim (as they themselves will tell you); descendants of Ashkenaz the grandson of Japheth. Their ancestry is from the Caucus Mountains of Southern Russia NOT Canaan.
Under the heading of “A brief History of the Terms for Jew” in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following: “Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.” (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3).
As you can see by the quote above from their own book they know they are not the Israelites (Jacobs children).
You however as I can see from your picture ARE a descendant of Jacob and that land belongs to you; and when Yashua returns the true Israelites will return to the land.
Luke 21:24 - And they (Israel) shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive INTO ALL NATIONS (Transatlantic Slave Trade): and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles (Current 'Jews" living in the land), until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled (return of the Messiah).
Under the heading of “A brief History of the Terms for Jew” in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following: “Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.” (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3).
As you can see by the quote above from their own book they know they are not the Israelites (Jacobs children).
You however as I can see from your picture ARE a descendant of Jacob and that land belongs to you; and when Yashua returns the true Israelites will return to the land.
Luke 21:24 - And they (Israel) shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive INTO ALL NATIONS (Transatlantic Slave Trade): and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles (Current 'Jews" living in the land), until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled (return of the Messiah).
(1)
(0)
PO3 Phyllis Maynard
LT Charles Baird I am so glad you dialouged exactly this. I have Orthodox Jew friends that I dialouge with and you are exactly correct. In fact, one woman and I cannot tolerate one another. I asked her how do I go about visiting an Orthodox Synagogue. She said we don't allow your kind. I stated "blacks", she stated that but not the way you think. We do not break tradition, but unorthodox synagogues or progressive synagouges will allow you to visit. The other reason is you are a Hebrew, Hashiem's chosen people who dwelled as slaves in Goshen. But as much as her acknowledgement I have studied the Jewish history in depth as well as the Dark Continent (Africa) and specific countries such as Ethiopia and Egypt. I was keeping it real simple to avoid a total massacre. I have also studied my DNA ancestry back to ancient African communities and compared my features to ancient Jewish rulers and African rulers. The Hebrews were negroid people. :0)
(0)
(0)
Read This Next