VA AG: "No legal effect" of 2nd Amendment Sanctuary resolutions

State, county, and municipal governments all over the US have decided by fiat that US Codes (USC) as they relate to illegal immigrants, cannot and will not be enforced in their respective jurisdictions. Every liberal and progressive socialist jurist categorically states that their refusal to enforce those laws are absolutely justified on "moral" grounds (note: their moral grounds, not mine). That being the case, how much more justified are the lawful bearers of firearms to also declare through their locally elected officials, that their governmental entity is also be considered as a sanctuary? After all, the progressives are refusing to obey a set of laws set forth in United States Code. We have declared that we will not obey commonwealth statutes that violate the protections enshrined in the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. In our case the opinion of the Virginia AG is of little worth. Very few will comply with their unconstitutional acts. I suspect they will have difficulty finding officers (law enforcement or National Guard) willing to use deadly force on their fellow Virginians. To those individuals who would be willing to murder their fellow citizens to enforce an unconstitutional law I only have one thing to say ... "come at me bra!"