Expert Soldier Badge Test an Unforgiving Wakeup Call for Non-Infantry Troops

How are proficiency tests for supporting elements any more or less important than the same for combat arms? Why should combat engagement be seen as a participation trophy for supporting MOSs? Does it rub you wrong that the people that allow you to do the job you do are trying to be equally recognized for their involvement or proficiency? I'd imagine it would be more beneficial for combat arms to promote support service members to train more on basic soldier tasks so it doesn't seem as though combat arms is carrying the team instead of minimalizing efforts to improve.

While combat arms are stateside, their job is to train and be proficient in these soldiering tasks, whereas supporting elements have their support roles to complete on top of soldier training. As a mechanic, our service schedule doesn't stop when we deploy or when we get back.
Trucks don't stop breaking. Making time in the schedule to stay on top of vehicle maintenance AND do training AND stay current on jumps AND fill details is not an easy task. When deployed I've recovered vehicles while under contact and on a separate occasion, was driving a 5,000 gallon bomb across Afghanistan getting ambushed with RPGs and small arms trying to turn me into a candle. I've seen 11b's get their CIBs for less. Just a bit of perspective from the other side. If your opinion is that the CAB and ESB are participation trophies, then by association so are other proficiency and involvement accolades of other specialties.

The CAB is not a participation award First Sergeant, if that’s true then the CIB is as well. I earned mine. Do you feel the CIB is a participation award? Same criteria except you have to be in an infantry unit etc.

SGT Mark Estes - "Blue Cord Syndrome" abounds, not ever going to escape it.