Posted on Nov 8, 2019
Ukraine Pressure Campaign Undermined 'Rule Of Law,' Top State Dept. Official Says
1.41K
21
17
4
4
0
It seems every time someone else testifies, the story is consistent on what was going on with Ukraine and Giuliani (who by his own admission was working on the personal interests of the POTUS).
Ukraine Pressure Campaign Undermined 'Rule Of Law,' Top State Dept. Official Says
Posted from npr.org
Office of the President (POTUS)
Donald Trump
Edited 5 y ago
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 5
3
3
0
LTC Stephen B.
Source testimony was 3rd or 4th hand information from Taylor, who wasn't on the call, didn't talk to Trump and didn't even see a transcript of the call until September, long after his texts over his "concern". Which means all Taylor was working on was rumors, and somehow another person citing his uninformed rumors makes the rumors more credible?
(1)
(0)
SPC Kevin Ford
LTC Stephen B. - At this point I no longer know if I should be taking you seriously or if you are just trolling.
(0)
(0)
SPC Kevin Ford
Ferrous Cranus is utterly impervious to reason, persuasion and new ideas, and when engaged in battle he will not yield an inch in his position regardless of its hopelessness. Though his thrusts are decisively repulsed, his arguments crushed in every detail and his defenses demolished beyond repair he will remount the same attack again and again with only the slightest variation in tactics. Sometimes out of pure frustration Philosopher will try...
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
We're now up to 5th-hand information. He's citing Taylor, who wasn't on the call, never talked to Trump, and heard from a friend who heard from a friend that someone else heard another person thought it was about Biden.
And we STILL have the transcript.
And we STILL have the transcript.
(2)
(0)
SPC Kevin Ford
LTC Stephen B. And the transcript is extremely damning for Trump. I know Trump likes to claim that it is "perfect" but that is just for the faithful who apparently don't take the time to read it.
What Kent is discussing is what was happening in the state department and that they were all told that they had to work with Giuliani and the messaging on why the aid was being withheld. Trump himself stated in the transcript that they were to coordinate with Giuliani and Giuliani's admission was that he was working for the personal interests of the president, not of the US government.
Right off the bat there is direct evidence that the POTUS is using the power and agencies of government to pursue personal political interests through Giuliani. A huge, no no. It's basically article II of the Nixon impeachment.
What Kent is discussing is what was happening in the state department and that they were all told that they had to work with Giuliani and the messaging on why the aid was being withheld. Trump himself stated in the transcript that they were to coordinate with Giuliani and Giuliani's admission was that he was working for the personal interests of the president, not of the US government.
Right off the bat there is direct evidence that the POTUS is using the power and agencies of government to pursue personal political interests through Giuliani. A huge, no no. It's basically article II of the Nixon impeachment.
(0)
(0)
LTC Stephen B.
The transcript proves there was no quid-pro-quo. Complete exoneration. Not sure what alternate universe you live in these days.
(2)
(0)
1
1
0
I can't wait to see what the Dems will cook up after Trump is reelected.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google