Posted on Oct 1, 2019
Chuck Grassley defends Ukraine whistleblower, breaking with GOP and Trump
2.5K
26
11
4
4
0
United States Senate
White House
Ukraine
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 3
4
4
0
If the whistleblower is identified, he will face the wrath of the federal government and Trump.
(4)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
Which would be in violation of federal law. That is why we have those laws. To protect folks that see or know of wrongdoing.
Like what Trump and company are doing.
Like what Trump and company are doing.
(2)
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
Unfortunately a large portion of the leaders in the Federal Government have been corrupted by Trump's authoritative style of leadership. A perfect example is the National Weather Service backing up Trump's stupid weather map.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
I agree with him though some members of Congress probably already know the guys name. I have no doubts about that. However he should be protected under the existing law. Knowing his name or political identity is completely unnecessary to judging the veracity of his claims.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
My, my, my we have a WB who does not want to be identified. Why, could it be they are not credible? If you make the case stand up and sound off. Besides it not like he told on Bill or Hillary. If he had I am sure he would be late for the grave by Friday.
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
The Intel Community IG, a Trump appointee, has already investigated the whistleblower's allegations and determined that they are both credible and urgent. In the case of whistleblowers, anonymity is a requirement to prevent retaliation, not assess credibility.
(2)
(0)
SPC Erich Guenther
LTC (Join to see) -Not exactly true. The IG forwarded the whistleblower complaint WITHOUT REVIEW OF THE PHONE TRANSCRIPT (ie: investigation was not complete) because the statute has a time limit on the reporting aspect and the IG was getting close to the deadline without successfully being able to obtain the transcript of the call and also the statement was "appears credible" which to me is a PC phrase implying he wasn't really sure it was a firm YES on credibility.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google