Posted on Sep 17, 2019
Father of Parkland shooting victim: 'Guns didn’t kill my daughter, Democratic policies did'
424
14
5
9
9
0
Interesting points.
Father of Parkland shooting victim: 'Guns didn’t kill my daughter, Democratic policies did'
Posted from foxnews.comPosted in these groups: 
Democrats
Gun Control
Democrats Gun Control
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 3
3
3
0
I'm sure that the gun control fans will dismiss this as grief-induced hysteria
(3)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
Even though ironically them using the kids as their face for gun control is emotional based efforts not fact driven
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
0
0
0
I hope when I read the book I find he comes out strongly against the idiocy of "The Gun Free School Zone Act".
Frankly, the only purpose I can see in the "Gun Free School Zone Act" (GFSZA) is to assure the safety of a homicidal maniac for the period of time he spends slaughtering children and teachers. He has a guarantee that he will have the ONLY gun within 1,000 feet of that school zone.
It was apparently originally intended as a law to harass lawful gun owners and CCW holders, by making them criminals if they lawfully possessed a gun in a school zone (see the school map of San Francisco) but repeated attacks and mass-murders of our children reveal the (at best) "unintended consequences" of that harassment law.
The fact that the gun-grabbers use these attacks to fuel their demagoguery is a clear indication that they now fully accept that slaughter of the innocents, caused by their "gun owner harassment law", even if it was not part of their plan from the start.
The slaughter of those children is only a tool for them to advance their agenda. They try to blame "lax gun laws", "assault weapons", "the NRA", for the blood that is on their hands. They refuse to consider the repeal of that GFSZA, because it serves their purpose so well. They implicitly accept any "unintended consequence" of the perverse and deadly GFSZA they pushed through under the guise of "school safety", and instead exploit the death and horror they have caused,while blaming innocent gun-owners.
These “forbidden areas” of otherwise lawful gun possession in San Francisco would follow much the same pattern in any city. Note that it is not recording areas within 1,000 feet of a school ZONE, but apparently only the school BUILDING.
https://sfplanning.org/resource/areas-within-1000-feet-san-francisco-school
Frankly, the only purpose I can see in the "Gun Free School Zone Act" (GFSZA) is to assure the safety of a homicidal maniac for the period of time he spends slaughtering children and teachers. He has a guarantee that he will have the ONLY gun within 1,000 feet of that school zone.
It was apparently originally intended as a law to harass lawful gun owners and CCW holders, by making them criminals if they lawfully possessed a gun in a school zone (see the school map of San Francisco) but repeated attacks and mass-murders of our children reveal the (at best) "unintended consequences" of that harassment law.
The fact that the gun-grabbers use these attacks to fuel their demagoguery is a clear indication that they now fully accept that slaughter of the innocents, caused by their "gun owner harassment law", even if it was not part of their plan from the start.
The slaughter of those children is only a tool for them to advance their agenda. They try to blame "lax gun laws", "assault weapons", "the NRA", for the blood that is on their hands. They refuse to consider the repeal of that GFSZA, because it serves their purpose so well. They implicitly accept any "unintended consequence" of the perverse and deadly GFSZA they pushed through under the guise of "school safety", and instead exploit the death and horror they have caused,while blaming innocent gun-owners.
These “forbidden areas” of otherwise lawful gun possession in San Francisco would follow much the same pattern in any city. Note that it is not recording areas within 1,000 feet of a school ZONE, but apparently only the school BUILDING.
https://sfplanning.org/resource/areas-within-1000-feet-san-francisco-school
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google