MEME THE LEFT

Come on Bryan, if Meuller had anything concrete they would have impeached. He knew he had nothing considering the "dossier" was a fictional story that was debunked. They were attempting to lay out a process crime, nothing more. There wasn't a single arrest related to "collusion" and you cannot obstruct a case where there is no crime when the POTUS didn't even use Executive Privilege to stop a subpoena.

It was a witch hunt, period. The only conspiracy was a bunch of never-trumpers got together who didn't want the status-quo interrupted. This isn't new, it's happened before (The Business Plot) and will happen again. The real crime is an attempt to subvert a duly elected POTUS. You are intelligent enough to see it, why can't you?

The Mueller report was concrete that he is a racist crook who cut a deal with Russia. But hey you can believe what you like but don't be pissing down our backs and say its raining.

Cpl (Join to see) - Mueller couldn't impeach or indict. That's exactly what he said.

And it's BS to say that because there was no indictable crime that there couldn't be obstruction. The whole point of obstruction is to make it appear that there is no indictable crime... so, if you did obstruction right, that's how it would seem. However, that's also what makes it hard to indict for it.

That being said, wasn't it POTUS who said that if you had nothing to hide, you'd talk to the police? Why didn't he volunteer to go on record during the investigation? To be interviewed?

I don't think it WAS a witch hunt. I am glad it's over.

What do you by "subvert" a duly elected President? What do you consider subversion? Or attempted subversion?

MAJ Bryan Zeski Show us where trump obstructed anything during the mueller witchhunt. The reason the whole thing took as long as it did is that they were trying everything, including process crimes and they didn't get trump on anything. Knowing that a conspiracy against our government from the inside is possible, why let hatred of trump cloud logic and reason.