Avatar feed
Responses: 6
LTC Eugene Chu
1
1
0
Edited 6 y ago
Personal opinion: While disadvantaged backgrounds deserve consideration, some college admission committees already do that. Essay portions of applications are where potential students can write about their life circumstances (e.g. first in family to college, overcoming poverty, immigrant family, military veteran experiences, etc.). It is there that one can express their holistic background.

It should not be with standardized testing...
(1)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Nondestructive Inspection (NDI)
MSgt (Join to see)
6 y
That is my opinion as well.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Matthew S.
1
1
0
I'm not quite sure where to go with this one. While there is some merit to the idea that a wealthier, better-prepared student ought to do better on the test... I don't know. Can't really wrap my head around it well enough. Need some more time to think on it.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Counterintelligence (CI) Agent
0
0
0
This is America realizing that education isn't simply about getting a high paying job, but about scouring the masses of citizens to hopefully find the untapped geniuses who would never get a chance to use their untapped talents to better their country, because they were never able to make it out of tough economic conditions as a kid. Mark Rober once said that the smartest person to ever live likely died from dehydration while looking for clean water, and thus was never discovered.

President Trump recently proposed the merit-based immigration reform, where the U.S. would increase efforts to recruit foreign talent, offering them citizenship as a result of their talent(s). This isn't new and is of course focused on quality over quantity. I believe one of the reasons is because we are internally doing a terrible job of cultivating talent from within. We aren't looking at the problem from a national perspective, but from one of self-interest. National perspective might inform us that it doesn't matter what socioeconomic group the American talent comes from, as long as they are American and have the abilities, we want to do whatever it takes to grow them from within. Self-interest might tell us that if we individually didn't have such an (dis)advantage, then no other American should have it either, regardless if it puts the U.S. in a position of international disadvantage.

Just my opinion though.
(0)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Nondestructive Inspection (NDI)
MSgt (Join to see)
>1 y
I grew up on welfare. I didn’t need extra points given to me to kick ass on my SATs. I read my way through the school library. Intelligent kids will find a way to succeed. I think we should work on ways to improving our education system. Why not give school vouchers to allow smart kids from bad neighborhoods to go to better schools instead of giving kids points to inflate their score on a standardized test? This way, instead of making it look like they are academically prepared for college, they really will be. We do need all or our smart kids to work to their potential. We definitely agree on that!
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Counterintelligence (CI) Agent
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
MSgt (Join to see),
I disagree with the idea that intelligent kids will find a way.
Anecdotal evidence does not apply to everyone, as circumstances vary too greatly. Some will find a way, some will become a product of their environment, and some will die before discovery.

In the articles it clearly states that it is a separate metric that schools see, not a hidden number that gets added into their total SAT score.

My point was that in my view, this isn't about the individual's success. This is about maximizing American talent without regard to socioeconomic status.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close