Posted on Mar 2, 2019
Trump fires up CPAC with expletive-laden description of Mueller probe: 'They're trying to take...
1.22K
30
21
5
5
0
Bottom line: when the Mueller report comes out - for your opinion or against it - will you accept it to be a true and just account of the facts?
And my two cents. For me, the answer is "yes." Even if the report comes back saying that POTUS did nothing wrong, ever, I'll take it at face value because I have respect for the time, process and integrity of the investigator.
What about you all? Time to get our preconceptions out in the open now - for accountability later.
And my two cents. For me, the answer is "yes." Even if the report comes back saying that POTUS did nothing wrong, ever, I'll take it at face value because I have respect for the time, process and integrity of the investigator.
What about you all? Time to get our preconceptions out in the open now - for accountability later.
Trump fires up CPAC with expletive-laden description of Mueller probe: 'They're trying to take...
Posted from foxnews.com
Donald Trump
Justice
Investigation
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
4
4
0
Mueller and the investigation is a shame to start with. The democrats have continued with all the Russian BS even after the FBI and the Senate said there was NO COLLUSION. Yet, the Mueller investigation was bias since day one with those who were put on the "investigation" team with a vendetta against President Trumps because they wanted Hillary to win. They have wasted millions of dollars and time that could have been better spent on moving this country forward. Yet the Democrats continue to tear this country apart because of their hatred toward President Trump. Even if the Mueller "investigation" was to show NO COLLUSION, I can guarantee the Democrats will automatically discard the report and still say there was collusion. The bottom line: Democrats will continue their vendetta against President Trump despite the investigation.
(4)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
MSgt (Join to see) - Yes, the report is complete. I haven't seen the report. I HAVE seen the AGs interpretation of the report. And I've seen other interpretations of the report. I'd like to actually SEE the report and make those determinations for myself.
However, from what seems conclusive, I DO believe that Mueller found that:
1. There was no direct collusion from the Trump campaign with the Russians.
2. Mueller did not conclude that there was or was not obstruction of justice (or attempted obstruction of justice) on the part of POTUS.
I stand by my original statement that I would and will take the report at face value - when we see it. Right now, McConnell is stalling/preventing the report from being asked for by the Senate. Why is that? I don't know. I definitely want the report released in its entirety (minus National Security Classified info). I think that it would be the most transparent and honest thing to do.
But again, YES, I take the report at face value because I absolutely DO trust Mueller.
Now, YOU said that it was a sham. Do you stand by your statement that the Mueller report is a sham? OR - now that it says what you thought to be true - are you changing your mind?
However, from what seems conclusive, I DO believe that Mueller found that:
1. There was no direct collusion from the Trump campaign with the Russians.
2. Mueller did not conclude that there was or was not obstruction of justice (or attempted obstruction of justice) on the part of POTUS.
I stand by my original statement that I would and will take the report at face value - when we see it. Right now, McConnell is stalling/preventing the report from being asked for by the Senate. Why is that? I don't know. I definitely want the report released in its entirety (minus National Security Classified info). I think that it would be the most transparent and honest thing to do.
But again, YES, I take the report at face value because I absolutely DO trust Mueller.
Now, YOU said that it was a sham. Do you stand by your statement that the Mueller report is a sham? OR - now that it says what you thought to be true - are you changing your mind?
(0)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
MSgt (Join to see) - Side note - if you go through my post history, you'll find that very few (if any) of my critical statements about POTUS have to do with Russia or collusion. Most are related to his personal character and perceived unethical or illegal business dealings.
(0)
(0)
MSgt (Join to see)
MAJ Bryan Zeski - As I have said before and again, Mueller and the investigation is a shame to start with. The "investigation" should not have been about President Trump. It should have been about the fake dossier written by a foreign agent who received his information from funded "research" which was paid for by Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. And the FBI "agents" who conspired against President Trump. Again, it was a BS investigation. Furthermore, I'm also correct when in my initial post "Even if the Mueller "investigation" was to show NO COLLUSION, I can guarantee the Democrats will automatically discard the report and still say there was collusion." And here it is.......https://www.foxnews.com/politics/adam-schiff-rejects-reports-no-more-mueller-indictments-forthcoming-says-special-counsel-could-be-called-to-testify
Adam Schiff rejects reports that Mueller indictments are over, says special counsel could be...
Adam Schiff rejected reports that no more Mueller indictments are coming, and suggested he would call the special counsel before a House panel if necessary to learn what is in the report.
(0)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
MSgt (Join to see) - You said, "I can guarantee the Democrats will automatically discard the report and still say there was collusion." And you linked to a Fox News article that you say supports your assertion.
Can you point out where in the article the Dems say 'there was collusion."? I didn't see it.
Also, can you deny that Russia DID try and interfere with the election? There is a LOT of evidence that they did. People were indicted for it. Having an investigation confirmed that - and confirmed that POTUS wasn't involved. You should be happy about the investigation.
Can you point out where in the article the Dems say 'there was collusion."? I didn't see it.
Also, can you deny that Russia DID try and interfere with the election? There is a LOT of evidence that they did. People were indicted for it. Having an investigation confirmed that - and confirmed that POTUS wasn't involved. You should be happy about the investigation.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
These probes made hurt the president in the short-term. I will tell you who's helping him, the Democrats who are trying to see who can be the most left. Here is an opinion from a convicted felon, former publisher of the Chicago Sun-Times and two other newspapers and a former appointed senator of Canada saying how President Trump is in an excellent position to win in 2020. The green New Deal may be exactly what needs to be pushed by the Democrats because it is too extreme for all the people with the exception of recluse Unabomber like Ted Kaczynski. The Ted Kaczynski comment is my emphasis and not of Conrad black. You get the gist.
http://www.conradmblack.com/1452/why-trump-is-destined-for-an-historic-2020-win
http://www.conradmblack.com/1452/why-trump-is-destined-for-an-historic-2020-win
Why Trump is Destined for an Historic 2020 Win :: Conrad Black
Each week, as the thundering host of Democratic seekers of their party's 2020 presidential nomination scramble for attention and try to outflank their rivals to the left, that party rolls out a new policy proposal that lurches further away from where
(2)
(0)
1
1
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google