Avatar feed
Responses: 9
CPT Jack Durish
5
5
0
You are correct. It is fundamentally the same strategy that we complained of when President Obama used "his pen and his phone". No. President Obama didn't invent it. Virtually every President has been "tempted" or actually attempted to circumvent Congress (Woodrow Wilson institutionalized the concept) but, as my mother oft reminded me, just because everyone else is doing it doesn't make it right...
(5)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
MAJ Bryan Zeski
6 y
CPT Jack Durish Glad we agree on some things!
(2)
Reply
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
CPT Jack Durish
6 y
MAJ Bryan Zeski - There's plenty, the important stuff, that we agree on. All else is just commentary
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Maj John Bell
2
2
0
Edited 6 y ago
Dangerous precedents are being set or contemplated by our elected politician's at break neck pace. They do not stop to think about what happens when "we're not the one in the driver's seat."

_Senate rule changes to eliminate the need for overwhelming consensus in favor of simple majority
_Failure to pass budgets and instead relying on continuing resolutions
_Impeachment as recall
_Failure to hold confirmation hearings because, its "too close" to the election, when it clearly was not.
_Jurisdictions choosing to not enforce the law of the land
_local elections granting voting rights to non-citizens
_The senate going beyond its advise and consent role.
_The growth of executive power at the expense of the legislative branch's power
_Weaponized congressional investigations

I truly believe this great experiment is starting to unravel; and it is not the fault of the elected officials. We tolerate it as long as in the short term, it fits our agenda. Never thinking of the long term consequences.
(2)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
MAJ Bryan Zeski
6 y
I agree with you on everything except who's fault it is. It IS the fault of the elected officials who refuse to put the values of America before personal gain. It's also the fault of everyone who continues to vote them into office.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LCDR Naval Aviator
2
2
0
If it's an emergency, it's an emergency; if he says he'll declare an emergency as a form of ultimatum, it's clearly not an emergency. He's simply trampling the Constitution here.
(2)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
MAJ Bryan Zeski
6 y
LCDR (Join to see) Not that I may not agree with you - but keep your head on a swivel. There are some Article 88 agents on RP looking to hem AD members up for speaking ill of POTUS. I know where my line is, just make sure you know where yours is. Watch out for "friendly" fire.
(2)
Reply
(0)
LCDR Naval Aviator
LCDR (Join to see)
6 y
I'm aware of case law involving Article 88, and I'm quite aware that I'm allowed to disagree with political actions, even vehemently. I'm not allowed to denigrate him personally, but we're very much allowed to disagree openly with his politics. If someone wants to try to crush me for caring about the Constitution I swore to defend, I'll happily defend myself at court-martial.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Joseph Weber
SFC Joseph Weber
6 y
I think the emergency is he can't cut a deal to get his wall he promised, not actually anything going on at the border.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close