Avatar feed
Responses: 4
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1
1
0
Surprisingly lacking in hype, a great article, thanks.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth
1
1
0
Great technology share brother.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Aircraft Mechanic
1
1
0
I don't know if I could ever trust anything that's not a main rotor/tail rotor or tandem rotor configuration.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSG Aircraft Mechanic
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
I don't like it. The main rotors turning counter to each other is what keeps the aircraft stable. Well what happens when one fails? You get spun into the ground. If one fails the second will likely fail simply because of proximity. It would be like the rotors of a Chinook being thrown out of sync. The whole thing would be torn apart.
(1)
Reply
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
>1 y
SSG (Join to see) - The USAF flew even more complex rotor systems, Intersecting rotor planes no less for a couple of decades with the Husky" it worked quite well From what I have read they were extremely stable in hover.

I remember seeing them fly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaman_HH-43_Huskie
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Aircraft Mechanic
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
1stSgt Nelson Kerr they were some brave people that flew in that thing.
(1)
Reply
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
>1 y
Sgtarried the were Air Rescue folks so insane levels of bravery are
a given even in peacetime.
But the Aircraft itself was famous for reliability and safety. The mission include a primary role hovering over a burning aircraft to drive flames away from the cockpit so the crew could escape , that take a very cold kind of courage even to take the job.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close