Posted on Aug 23, 2018
Warfare History Network » Military Tanks as “Mechanical Cavalry”: A Poor Concept in Practice?
1.91K
13
4
5
5
0
Good article on why the US never got it early in the war on the use of tanks. What really peaks the interest in this is our perceived role of the tank destroyer. How radically different was the German concept of the use and place of the tank destroyer from where we were at by 1942.
Warfare History Network » Military Tanks as “Mechanical Cavalry”: A Poor Concept in Practice?
Posted from warfarehistorynetwork.com
Doctrine
Cavalry
Armor
Warfare
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
3
3
0
Sometimes nations manufacture poor weapons systems, tactics, and doctrine which proved costly. The German WWI AAR solved immobility with their tanks for maneuver warfare.
(3)
(0)
3
3
0
1
1
0
I believe Patton was the hold up on deploying a tank better than the Sherman.
(1)
(0)
1stSgt Eugene Harless
Myths of American Armor. TankFest Northwest 2015
I was invited to go up to TankFest Northwest by the Flying Heritage Collection. I chose to address some of the common misconceptions about American armor in ...
I see you have read Beltran Cooper's book. In reality Patton, actually even Ike had zero say in when and if weapons systems were deployed, although they did push for needs. The M-26 Pershing started being developed in late 43 early 44 after the prototypes of the M-6, T-23 and T26 failed to meet standards.
The US Armor board was adamant that they needed to avoid the mistakes that the Germans made in trying to use the front lines as a testing ground. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNjp_4jY8pY&t=23s
The US Armor board was adamant that they needed to avoid the mistakes that the Germans made in trying to use the front lines as a testing ground. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNjp_4jY8pY&t=23s
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google